24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For Bede and for the Christian commentary tradition of which he was a part, the process of<br />

textual interpretation structured habit not by pointing the reader to a rule he must follow but by<br />

making the ways by which he arrived at the truth a part of his ethical and political life. 22 The<br />

oath-making qualities of speech made the process of exegesis into a political praxis.<br />

Closely analyzing this Christian tradition of speech as praxis, this chapter argues that the<br />

political usage of Christian exegesis came to a turning point in the late-fourteenth and early-<br />

fifteenth centuries because the Church, as a political unit, began to re-evaluate the role of<br />

metaphoric utterances and exegesis in the conveyance of “truth.” I will argue, that for the<br />

Church, this hermeneutic change was most pronounced in its legal justification for the<br />

colonization of non-Christian lands. This argument is inseparable from three claims which I will<br />

develop throughout this chapter. First, an ontological tenet of Christian exegesis at the turn of the<br />

fourteenth century was that concepts and their representation were intrinsically tied. Second, the<br />

turn of the fifteenth century assimilated this type of “nominalism” to rearticulate Christendom as<br />

a legal and not just as a religious community. Lastly, Popes, canonists, and monarchs closely<br />

attended to the literary allusions, connotations, and metaphoric implications of their colonial<br />

discourse because they recognized that the exertion of political authority rested upon the<br />

metaphoric qualities of their discourse.<br />

In laying out this argument, this chapter will detail the religious and metaphoric logics<br />

which allowed the fourteenth-century to conceive of authority discursively. In particular, I will<br />

argue that the fourteenth century’s turn to the presence of speech itself as a way to project power<br />

allowed Popes and sovereigns to adopt legal traditions through semantic and metaphoric play,<br />

instead of relying on explicit legal arguments, to assert Christendom’s right to infidel lands.<br />

22 For examples of this, see Jean Leclercq, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God: A Study of Monastic<br />

Culture, (New York: Fordham <strong>University</strong> Press, 1982) 73; Coleman Ancient 143; and Calvin Kendall,<br />

“Introduction,” On Genesis by Bede, trans. Calvin Kendall. (Liverpool: Liverpool <strong>University</strong> Press, 2008) 37.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!