24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

progression. 129 Therefore, as many other scholars have argued since Derek Pearsall’s analysis of<br />

Gower’s narrative art, the problem with finding an “author function” in the Confessio is not<br />

because the work removes Gower from its development but because it gives him too many roles<br />

to inhabit. 130<br />

Further, as John Hurt Fisher’s study of thematic concordance of the works and life of<br />

John Gower has made clear, the purely textual qualities of the Confessio’s “author function”<br />

have not kept the poem’s many themes from cohering as if guided by an ideal image of Gower’s<br />

persona or of a reason for arranging these tales in a dialogue. 131 The tension between the implied<br />

fictional and narrative personas within the stated physical commissioning of the work even<br />

seems, in Peter Nicholson’s words, to help readers distinguish “between the subject of the poem<br />

and broader moral and ethical concerns” that seem to perplex the narrative voice in the work. 132<br />

This is because the failure of an idealized persona to conform to a “real” image of the poet helps<br />

a reader idealize this dialogue with larger thematic concerns. Consequently, although the name<br />

“Gower” is not explicitly guiding our readerly perspective throughout the gathering of stories,<br />

according to Kurt Olsson, it is the ability of the Confessio’s “discordant ‘sentences’ not to<br />

distance readers from wisdom, but better to ensure their achieving it” that give the work a unity<br />

that can be attributed to an idealized “auctoritas.” 133<br />

129<br />

See Winthrop Wetherbee, “Latin Structure and Vernacular Space: Gower, Chaucer and the Boethian Tradition,”<br />

Chaucer and Gower: Difference, Mutuality, Exchange, ed. R.F. Yeager (Victoria: ELS, 1991) 30 and A.J. Minnis<br />

“De Vulgari Auctoritate: Chaucer, Gower and Men of Great Authority.” Chaucer and Gower: Difference, Mutuality,<br />

Exchange, ed. R.F. Yeager, ELS Monograph Series. 51. (Victoria: English Literary Studies, 1991) 54.<br />

130<br />

Ardis Butterfield, “Articulating the Author: Gower and the French Vernacular Codex,” The Yearbook of English<br />

Studies, 33 Medieval and Early Modern Miscellanies and Anthologies (2003): 81-82.<br />

131<br />

John H. Fisher, John Gower: Moral Philosopher and Friend of Chaucer (New York: New York <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

1964) 135.<br />

132<br />

Peter Nicholson, Love and Ethics in Gower's Confessio Amantis (Ann Arbor: <strong>University</strong> of Michigan Press,<br />

2005) 124.<br />

133 Olsson 14.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!