24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

monarch took it upon himself to declare war against infidelity, claiming that his voice alone was<br />

a sufficient guarantor of the legitimacy of war and of the seizing of property.<br />

In encountering the Portuguese claims towards the Canary Islands, Eugene IV was<br />

caught between a rock and hard place. On the one hand, he could not forsake the universal<br />

concept of law and allow the conquest to be based on the un-Christian use of authority against<br />

infidels. On the other, he still had to protect the Church’s position in the Islands by asserting his<br />

authority over them. Thus, Eugene faced the tenuous position of asserting a universal right of all<br />

humans to “libertas” while still claiming that this right was only preserved through the coming of<br />

Christ. This crisis of the concept of sovereignty is reflected in his rhetoric which repeats the<br />

conclusions of Vladimiri (that infidels have authority by right) but uses the premises of<br />

Hostiensis (that sovereignty is maintained by Christ’s representation) to describe his actions.<br />

Eugene’s balancing act did not last. With the rescinding of Creator omnium, an impasse<br />

was resolved in his mind by the very sovereign who was most affected by his indecision—<br />

Duarte I, the King of Portugal. 117 Despite explicit reservations (and outright challenges) by major<br />

legal scholars of the time, the Papacy authorized the enslavement of infidels and the continuance<br />

of Portugal’s crusade over the Islands after the Portuguese King argued for the necessity of an<br />

outright crusade. 118 In so doing, Eugene was not only caving to the pressures of an advancing<br />

colonial enterprise, but he was also rejecting the very legal foundations which belied the<br />

judgment of the Council of Constance concerning infidel lands.<br />

This is all the more visible by an anonymous legal opinion which Eugene explicitly<br />

consulted in evaluating Duarte’s claim of crusade against infidel lands:<br />

Ad ultimum, de Cruzata, etiam anima diuertat dominus noster: quia eius predecessor Martinus non<br />

concessit domino regi Johanni, patri huius, nisi quoad viveret; et hoc fecit cum summa difficultate,<br />

117 Monumenta 5.255 note 1.<br />

118 For a summary of these views, see Muldoon Popes 124-128.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!