24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

desirous and fulfillers of their own wills, and disordered and destroyers of the people. And such<br />

kings, like these, are not called kings, but are called tyrants.’ 284<br />

Therefore, the Trastamaran discourse against Pedro was not only novel but it also showed<br />

a subtle understanding of this long tradition in not assuming that Pedro’s tyranny and apostasy<br />

were sufficient grounds to remove him. As the historian Luís Suárez Fernández has argued, the<br />

Trastamaran supporters knew channeled Pedro’s tyranny and apostasy into a third problem—into<br />

the illegitimacy of his brand of authority. 285 The rallying cry of Enrique’s supporters synthesized<br />

both images of Pedro—as a sinner and as a tyrant—into a third one of him as an enemy: “tirano<br />

malo enemigo de Dios e de la su sancta Madre Eglesia” ‘evil tyrant enemy of God and of his<br />

holy Mother Church.’ 286<br />

In Trastamaran discourse, Pedro’s evil actions were the embodiment of a form of<br />

authority inimical to the very life of the State. For example, the execution of rebellious nobles<br />

became specifically the persecution of “hijosdalgos” ‘noble sons,’ and so represented more than<br />

murder and despotism but the very peril of ending the state’s future by killing its progeny.<br />

Pedro’s disfavor of older nobles, more than unjust or prideful, was represented as the banishment<br />

of the State’s very blood by the extermination of entire noble lines. His unpopular taxes were not<br />

only attacked as the bypassing of Castile’s legislative body, the Cortes, or the refusal of charity<br />

to the poor but as a denial of the state’s nourishment. Even the most effective accusation against<br />

him, his personal favor to Moors and Jews did not suffice as a lone attack against the king but<br />

had to be framed as support for Moorish and Jewish “enemies” of the State even when such<br />

“enemies” had long safe guarded the state’s borders and served as its financiers. Pedro was not<br />

284 Juan Manuel 138.<br />

285 Suárez Fernández Monarquía 25.<br />

286 See Vicente Álvarez Palenzuela, Historia de España de la Edad Media (Barcelona: Ariel, 2002) 670-671 and<br />

Valdeon Baruque 96-98.<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!