24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is maintained although knowing the definition of a right angle is central to Bartholomaeus’s<br />

figuration of a triangle’s corner as the soul and although the text itself leaves an opening for a<br />

commentator to explain the concept to his readers—“what is an euene cornere, it is determined in<br />

anoþer place.”<br />

Trevisa holds back from disturbing the text with an extensive abstract aside on the<br />

meaning of a right angle not because he does not know what an “euene cornere” is but because<br />

his source’s mathematical and moral allegory inhabited the traditional way of teaching<br />

mathematical concepts as applied knowledge. This pedagogic tradition weighs so much on the<br />

text that Bartholomaeus (and here Trevisa dutifully follows suit) claims to maintain the exact<br />

terminology of his source at the risk of introducing a reader to unknown mathematical concepts,<br />

such as a right angle. If either Bartholomaeus or Trevisa were to introduce short aside to clarify<br />

the meaning of “angle,” they would have severed the fluidity of the theological argument. As<br />

such, the text would have not been a pedagogical exercise since it did not clarify mathematics<br />

concurrently with a parallel allegory in another field. 384<br />

Turning to On the Governance, we could speculate that Trevisa’s lengthy aside about<br />

geometry, despite its awkwardness, could be an attempt to tie the explanation of a mathematical<br />

concept to a political one. Assuming that Trevisa’s vernacular translations reached an unlearned<br />

and not simply a scholarly audience, his aside would work in concurrent mathematical and<br />

political levels to bring a reader to broader conceptual understanding. In general, this would<br />

seem to tie well with the image that Trevisa developed his commentaries as material explication<br />

of concepts for vernacular audiences. As Fiona Somerset has argued, Trevisa’s asides portray<br />

more than a linguistic clarification of facts. Rather, in requiring a reader to access a wider<br />

384 Edith Sylla, “Thomas Bradwardine’s De Continuo and the Structure of Fourteenth-Century Learning,” Texts and<br />

Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Science: Stuides on the Occasion of John E. Murdoch’s Seventieth Birthday, eds.<br />

Edith Sylla and Michael McVaugh (New York: Brill, 1997) 186.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!