24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

imprisonment. 276 In other words, Ayala’s age and service reveal his closeness and growing<br />

maturity to the service of one monarch via an implicit change, and yet we never learn when or<br />

what impelled him to grow closer to Enrique’s cause.<br />

In effect, Guzmán removes the details of Ayala’s life, which could relate to the<br />

experiences of the reader despite using these details to make a point about the Chancellor’s life.<br />

Ayala’s life is therefore timed through silence, hidden away between his “moçedad” ‘youth’ and<br />

his political career as a member of the king’s “conseio” ‘council.’ This silence is significant at<br />

least for a reader who saw the love of the two kings as important to the verisimilitude of Ayala’s<br />

character. For the event which Guzmán’s portrait glosses over implicitly is not only an important<br />

part of the Chancellor’s life but also an important event in the history of Castile: the first<br />

deposition of a king by a “popular” movement, namely the Trastamaran Revolution of 1369.<br />

In order to understand how the Trastamaran Revolution registered for readers and how it<br />

affected the writing of “true” stories, we need to go into some detail about the cultural discourses<br />

which the Trastamaran ascendancy, which Ayala was clearly a part of, put into place. The<br />

Revolution receives its name from the Castilian nobility’s successful supplanting of Pedro I with<br />

the eldest son of his father’s mistress—Enrique Trastamara. Although historians disagree on its<br />

causes, they all agree that Enrique’s success had no ideological or legal precedent in Castile<br />

given that Pedro had legitimately held power for close to twenty years and Enrique himself was<br />

not the closest kin to the crown. Consequently, removing Pedro from the throne required more<br />

than a refashioning of the power structure in Castile; it required a re-conceptualization of the<br />

legitimacy of sovereign authority. Because of this, historians have argued that the Trastamaran<br />

cause represented a “revolution” in the fullest sense of the term, not only in supplanting one<br />

276 Constance Wilkins and Heanon Wilkins, “Estudio Preliminar,” Corónica de Pedro I, eds. Constance L. Wilkins<br />

and Heanon Wilkins (Madison: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies, 1985) vii-viii.<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!