24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

condemned by the moral precepts advanced in the letter) and to insert themselves into history (so<br />

as to relate to the narrative to their involvement of an evil monarch from the throne).<br />

8. Reading without Time: Portraying Truth in History<br />

To a Trastamaran reader, the events depicted in Ayala’s chronicle simply could not have<br />

a direct historical relationship to its moral meaning. That is, their complexity made it difficult to<br />

read in them a “moral” of the unfolding of history. Following the Prologue to the Corónica, this<br />

fictional letter appears to be true only in relating to universal ideals—to an atemporal plane—and<br />

not from reflecting the personal, lived experiences of its teller. Yet following the narrator’s way<br />

of presenting events in a personal viewpoint, these universal ideals are presented as if they<br />

occurred to someone in sometime. As such, the only way to read Benaharin’s letter following<br />

Ayala’s guidelines is in the most rudimentary level without interpreting it generally as a<br />

traditional speculum or specifically as an account of history. In essence, Benaharin’s letter must<br />

be read as an actual letter delivered to the king at a particular time regardless of how stylized and<br />

fictional it appears.<br />

If we think of this clearly fictional letter as part of true history, what becomes apparent is<br />

that the time when Pedro receives the letter is more important than its message: after his victory<br />

at Nájera and before his final defeat at Montiel. These two battles (Nájera, where Pedro, with<br />

English help, took back his throne after fleeing the advance of Enrique’s mercenaries, and<br />

Montiel, where Enrique and the French attacked a weak Pedro without his English allies)<br />

coincide with the rise and fall of the king and allow the letter to introduce dramatic irony to the<br />

chronicle. By the battle of Nájera, the reader knows that Pedro has run out of time to govern his<br />

country well, and therefore, that this letter arrived a little too late to have any effect on his<br />

policies or to reverse the cruelty of the policies outlined through most of the chronicle.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!