24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cannot tell a reader that he will violate the narrative pact of verisimilitude because a reader<br />

would not believe his story as a real event. Guzmán’s notion of history, however, does precisely<br />

that. It voices a known cultural ideal as a principle for narrative creation when it shows the mix<br />

of clerical and political life in an uncertain “legendary” status to what should be a factual<br />

account. Consequently, the portrait’s rhetoric makes the reader question the principle of its<br />

narrative construction by openly using culturally situated ideologies as ways to construe a<br />

supposedly “objective” history.<br />

5. True Events: the Trastamaran Revolution<br />

This is not to say that Guzmán’s Generaciones y Semblanzas merely plays readerly<br />

expectations against one another without prompting its readers to think of the portraits as<br />

historical depiction of events. After all, the people it portrays were known to its readers as<br />

influential to their society and, given the closeness of the Castilian court, may have been vividly<br />

remembered as family members. Further, because Generaciones depicted lives from the recent<br />

past, a reader would have more of an incentive to think of Ayala’s portrait as depicting a “true”<br />

and not a “stylized” access to reality.<br />

In fact, Guzmán makes it clear that the Chancellor’s life had a real effect in the reader’s<br />

culture by contextualizing it with the life of two kings, Pedro I and Enrique II: “Ouo grant lugar<br />

açerca de los reyes en cuyo tienpo fue, ca, seyendo moço, fue bien quisto del rey don Pedro, e,<br />

despues, del rey don Enrique el Segundo fue de su conseio e amado del” ‘He had a great place<br />

close to the kings in whose time he was, that, while being a young man, he was well loved of the<br />

king Don Pedro, and, later, he was of the council of the king Don Enrique the Second and loved<br />

by him.’ 273 This type of contextual dating not only situates Ayala in an “actual” history, but it<br />

introduces the first judgment about Ayala’s character—that he was a man worthy to be loved.<br />

273 Pérez de Guzmán Generaciones 41.<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!