01.06.2013 Views

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Numerous operators have worked on the <strong>Project</strong> since the initial discovery in 1952.<br />

Completed work includes 183 diamond surface drillholes, underground development<br />

and 519 holes underground diamond drillholes, together with mapping, trenching and<br />

geophysics. The majority of the work focused on the East Zone, which has<br />

underground development on six levels.<br />

1.5 M INERAL R ESOURCE E STIMATE<br />

This PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are<br />

considered too speculative geologically, on which to apply economic considerations<br />

to categorize them as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that the estimates<br />

contained in this PEA will be realized.<br />

The resource estimation at a 0.2% nickel equivalent (NiEq) cut-off resulted in an<br />

Indicated Resource of 14.4 Mt at grades of 0.68% nickel, 0.62% copper, and 2.23 g/t<br />

platinum+palladium+gold. An additional Inferred Resource of 446.6 Mt at grades of<br />

0.31% nickel, 0.25% copper, and 0.87 g/t platinum+palladium+gold. Table 1.2<br />

summarizes the results of the resource estimate from within the optimized open pit.<br />

Table 1.2 <strong>Wellgreen</strong> Mineral Resource Summary<br />

NiEq<br />

Cut-off Category Zone Tonnes NiEq%<br />

Prophecy Platinum Corp. 1-5 1193460500-REP-R0001-02<br />

<strong>Wellgreen</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Preliminary</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>,<br />

Yukon, Canada<br />

Ni<br />

(%)<br />

Cu<br />

(%)<br />

Co<br />

(%)<br />

Au<br />

(g/t)<br />

Pt<br />

(g/t)<br />

Pd<br />

(g/t)<br />

0.2 Indicated Pitshell 14,432,900 1.4 0.68 0.62 0.05 0.51 0.99 0.73<br />

0.2 Inferred Pitshell 446,649,000 0.6 0.31 0.25 0.02 0.16 0.38 0.33<br />

The fundamental difference between the 2011 Tetra Tech resource and the 2012<br />

Tetra Tech resource is that the new metal pricing allowed for a greater amount of the<br />

PGE material to be included with the potential pit, resulting in the application of a<br />

lower NiEq cut-off. In addition, the application of engineering design at a PEA level<br />

supports the low mining cost per unit tonnes processed.<br />

Tonnes<br />

Ni<br />

(%)<br />

Cu<br />

(%)<br />

Co<br />

(%)<br />

Au<br />

(g/t)<br />

Pt<br />

(g/t)<br />

Pd<br />

(g/t)<br />

2012 Tetra Tech PEA Model<br />

Indicated Resource @ 0.2% NiEq cut-off 14,423,900 0.68 0.62 0.05 0.51 0.99 0.73<br />

Inferred Resources @ 0.2% NiEq cut-off<br />

2011 Tetra Tech Resource Model<br />

446,649,000 0.31 0.25 0.02 0.16 0.38 0.33<br />

Indicated Resource @ 0.4% NiEq cut-off 14,308,000 0.69 0.62 0.05 0.52 0.99 0.74<br />

Inferred Resources @ 0.4% NiEq cut-off 289,246,000 0.38 0.35 0.03 0.23 0.53 0.42<br />

Previous exploration has concentrated on the lower gabbroic section of the ultramafic<br />

body for semi-massive nickel sulphides. Recent exploration has concentrated on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!