01.06.2013 Views

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prophecy Platinum Corporation – <strong>Wellgreen</strong> Property – <strong>Project</strong> 50149-001<br />

Table 24: High Ni Composite Split Flowsheet Flotation Tests HNI-F3 & F4 Results<br />

Test Product Weight<br />

Assays, (Pt, Pd, Au g/t), (Cu, Ni, S %) % Distribution<br />

% Cu Ni Pt Pd Au S Fe MgO Cu Ni Pt Pd Au S Fe MgO<br />

Bulk 3rd Clnr Conc 3.1 10.3 11.0 2.32 8.11 0.94 28.8 33.9 1.82 67.6 41.8 12.6 44.9 40.2 13.9 5.9 0.3<br />

Bulk 2nd Clnr Conc 4.2 7.95 10.3 2.18 6.68 0.74 27.6 34.1 3.32 70.1 52.6 15.9 49.7 42.5 17.9 7.9 0.7<br />

Bulk 1st Clnr Conc 6.2 5.95 8.32 2.23 5.38 0.54 24.9 33.2 5.39 77.3 62.6 23.9 58.9 45.8 23.8 11.4 1.7<br />

HNI-F3 Bulk Rougher Conc 10.6 3.64 5.65 1.93 3.58 0.36 21.0 31.4 9.06 81.0 72.8 35.5 67.1 51.8 34.4 18.4 5.0<br />

4 kg Ni 3rd Clnr Conc 1.1 1.50 1.80 2.64 1.54 0.31 34.1 53.8 0.98 3.4 2.4 4.9 2.9 4.6 5.7 3.2 0.1<br />

Ni 2nd Clnr Conc 1.9 1.06 1.63 2.36 1.24 0.23 32.1 52.1 2.17 4.3 3.8 7.8 4.2 6.0 9.4 5.5 0.2<br />

Ni 1st Clnr Conc 4.2 0.67 1.26 1.91 0.92 0.16 28.7 46.9 4.08 6.0 6.5 14.1 6.9 9.6 18.8 11.0 0.9<br />

Ni Scav Conc 9.5 0.46 0.92 1.55 0.77 0.12 18.7 34.2 11.1 9.2 10.6 25.6 13.0 15.3 27.5 18.1 5.5<br />

Ni Scav Tail 79.9 0.06 0.17 0.28 0.14 0.03 3.08 14.3 21.4 9.8 16.6 38.9 19.9 32.9 38.1 63.5 89.5<br />

Head (calc.) 0.47 0.82 0.58 0.56 0.07 6.46 18.0 19.1<br />

Bulk 2nd Clnr Conc 4.0 9.68 9.07 2.35 7.46 0.81 28.0 35.3 2.51 77.0 43.3 17.3 52.1 32.9 16.6 7.7 0.5<br />

HNI-F4 Bulk Rougher Conc 10.2 4.08 5.61 1.75 3.78 0.37 18.7 27.8 10.9 82.6 68.1 32.7 67.2 38.5 28.2 15.5 5.8<br />

Ni 3rd Clnr Conc 1.6 1.62 2.80 3.15 2.00 1.46 30.2 47.2 4.31 5.1 5.2 9.1 5.5 23.3 7.0 4.1 0.4<br />

Ni 2nd Clnr Conc 2.4 1.21 2.48 2.77 1.66 1.04 29.1 46.2 5.06 5.8 7.2 12.4 7.0 25.5 10.4 6.1 0.6<br />

Ni 1st Clnr Conc 4.6 0.79 1.94 2.30 1.26 0.64 25.3 41.7 7.63 7.2 10.6 19.5 10.1 30.0 17.2 10.5 1.8<br />

Ni Scav Conc 12.4 0.38 1.04 1.38 0.70 0.30 17.8 31.8 11.8 9.3 15.3 31.6 15.2 37.9 32.6 21.6 7.6<br />

Ni Scav Tail 77.4 0.05 0.18 0.25 0.13 0.03 3.42 14.8 21.4 8.2 16.6 35.7 17.6 23.6 39.2 62.9 86.6<br />

Head (calc.) 0.50 0.84 0.54 0.57 0.10 6.76 18.2 19.1<br />

Test HNI-F5 was conducted with less SIPX in the scavenger and longer scavenger re-grind. While Ni<br />

recovery improved in this test, Ni grade was lower.<br />

Overall, the results for high Ni <strong>com</strong>posite show the bulk circuit is pretty good without CMC/guar in<br />

rougher. It seems more SIPX is needed in the bulk rougher 2 in order to get higher recovery. It is needed<br />

to make better concentrate on Ni side. The issue is pyrrhotite flotation here. Copper sulphate was not<br />

used for this <strong>com</strong>posite. It is suggested to use less SIPX in scavenger and cleaner stages.<br />

The results for this test are shown in Table 25 and are presented in detail in Appendix E.<br />

Table 25: High Ni Composite Split Flotation Test HNI-F5 Results<br />

Test Product Weight Assays, (Cu, Ni, S %) % Distribution<br />

% Cu Ni S Cu Ni S<br />

Bulk 2nd Clnr Conc 5.2 7.91 8.75 28.5 79.2 55.3 21.3<br />

Bulk 1st Clnr Conc 7.6 5.44 6.28 24.7 80.3 58.5 27.3<br />

HNI-F5 Bulk Rougher Conc 15.9 2.67 3.26 18.7 81.8 63.1 42.8<br />

Ni 3rd Clnr Conc 0.8 4.04 3.73 24.0 5.9 3.4 2.6<br />

Ni 2nd Clnr Conc 1.5 2.25 2.81 22.0 6.5 5.2 4.8<br />

Ni 1st Clnr Conc 3.1 1.37 2.54 15.8 8.3 9.7 7.1<br />

Ni Scav Conc 8.2 0.69 2.12 14.4 10.9 21.2 17.1<br />

Ni Scav Tail 75.9 0.05 0.17 3.67 7.3 15.7 40.1<br />

Head (calc.) 0.52 0.82 6.94<br />

Finally, one locked cycle test (LCT-4) was conducted on High Ni Composite sample using the same test<br />

conditions as master <strong>com</strong>posite LCT-3. Reagents were adjusted accordingly and no CuSO4 was used in<br />

this test.<br />

The results for this test are shown in Table 26 and detailed test conditions and results are presented in<br />

Appendix F.<br />

SGS Minerals Services<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!