01.06.2013 Views

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prophecy Platinum Corporation – <strong>Wellgreen</strong> Property – <strong>Project</strong> 50149-001<br />

Table 12: Cu/Ni Separation Test (Sep-F1) Results<br />

Product Weight<br />

Assays, (Pt, Pd, Au g/t), (Cu, Ni, S, fe, MgO %)<br />

% Distribution<br />

% Cu Ni Pt Pd Au S Fe MgO Cu Ni Pt Pd Au S Fe MgO<br />

Cu Cleaner 1 Conc. 0.2 31.3 0.38 1.50 6.04 0.83 31.4 30.4 0.70 19.1 0.2 0.8 2.4 3.8 2.6 0.5 0.0<br />

Cu Rghr Conc. 1.1 17.9 1.72 2.22 9.14 0.73 22.5 21.3 1.68 60.2 4.4 6.2 20.1 18.4 10.4 1.9 0.1<br />

Cu Cleaner 1 Tails (Ni Conc.) 0.9 14.9 2.01 2.38 9.83 0.71 0.71 19.3 1.90 41.1 4.2 5.4 17.7 14.6 7.8 1.4 0.1<br />

(Cu Rghr Tails (Ni Conc.) 2.0 2.51 9.75 4.52 9.47 0.33 22.3 31.9 5.70 16.2 47.4 24.0 39.7 15.9 19.8 5.3 0.5<br />

Total Ni Conc. 2.9 6.23 7.43 3.88 9.58 0.44 21.8 28.1 4.56 57.3 51.6 29.4 57.4 30.5 27.6 6.7 0.6<br />

Bulk 3rd Clnr Conc 3.1 7.79 6.99 3.73 9.36 0.47 22.4 28.3 4.32 76.4 51.8 30.2 59.8 34.3 30.2 7.2 0.6<br />

Bulk 2nd Clnr Conc 5.0 5.06 5.19 3.29 6.67 0.36 18.1 26.6 9.20 81.9 63.4 43.9 70.3 43.8 40.4 11.2 2.0<br />

Bulk 1st Clnr + Clnr Scav Conc 11.5 2.36 2.63 1.99 3.33 0.21 11.1 20.4 16.9 86.9 73.1 60.5 80.0 57.7 56.3 19.5 8.3<br />

Bulk Rghr Conc 19.4 1.42 1.63 1.33 2.06 0.13 7.49 17.1 19.7 88.1 76.6 68.0 83.2 61.4 64.0 27.5 16.2<br />

Bulk Rghr Tail 80.6 0.05 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.02 1.01 10.8 24.5 11.9 23.4 32.0 16.8 38.6 36.0 72.5 83.8<br />

4.1.4. Split-Stream Flowsheet<br />

A split-stream flow sheet was also tested and initial fast-floating copper minerals were cleaned separately<br />

from slower floating nickel minerals. Test F18 was performed with the objective of producing a copper<br />

concentrate that could be marketed to a smelter and a bulk copper-nickel concentrate to be processed in<br />

a hydrometallurgy process. Since the first and second timed rougher concentrates were high grade in<br />

copper, <strong>com</strong>bined and was cleaned separately to produce a copper concentrate. The remainder of the<br />

rougher concentrate (rougher concentrates 3-5) was cleaned separately in three stages. The results are<br />

shown in Table 13. Detailed test results are presented in the Appendix E. It can be concluded that the<br />

copper grade in the final Cu concentrate reached 28% Cu with a low recovery of about 27%. While the<br />

grade of copper into the Cu concentrate was high, the nickel content in the copper concentrate was 0.5%.<br />

With two cleaning stages a lower copper grade of 20% Cu concentrate with 65% recovery was achieved.<br />

Nickel did not upgrade to any significant level in the bulk concentrate. In this concentrate, nickel grade<br />

and recovery were 4% Ni and 7%, respectively. The other main portions of nickel were in the copper<br />

cleaner tails and bulk rougher tails. Pyrrhotite deports mainly to the low-nickel grade concentrate.<br />

Table 13: The Split-Stream Test (F18) Results<br />

Product Weight<br />

Assays, (Pt, Pd, Au g/t), (Cu, Ni, S, Fe, MgO %)<br />

% Distribution<br />

% Cu Ni Pt Pd Au S Fe MgO Cu Ni Pt Pd Au S Fe MgO<br />

Bulk Clnr 3 Conc 0.8 1.34 4.02 7.10 2.68 0.33 19.7 29.2 2.74 2.9 6.8 13.5 4.7 5.2 5.1 1.7 0.1<br />

Bulk Clnr 2 Conc 1.6 0.95 3.07 5.34 2.24 0.23 20.2 34.2 5.98 4.4 11.0 21.5 8.3 7.7 11.0 4.2 0.4<br />

Bulk Clnr 1 + Clnr 1 Scav Conc 6.0 0.44 1.39 2.51 1.18 0.11 12.9 25.8 14.5 7.5 18.2 36.8 16.0 14.0 25.6 11.6 4.0<br />

Bulk Rghr 3-5 Conc 12.2 0.26 0.80 1.45 0.70 0.07 8.46 19.9 18.6 8.9 21.3 43.4 19.3 16.5 34.3 18.3 10.3<br />

Bulk Rghr Tail 78.4 0.04 0.11 0.14 0.07 0.02 1.51 12.0 22.7 8.0 18.9 27.0 12.5 32.3 39.5 70.8 81.2<br />

Ro1-2 Cu Clnr 3 Conc.(High Cu Conc.) 0.3 28.4 0.46 1.82 13.2 1.72 29.5 28.4 2.79 26.9 0.3 1.5 10.0 11.8 3.3 0.7 0.0<br />

Ro1-2 Cu Clnr 2 Conc. 1.1 19.7 1.32 2.31 11.4 1.51 22.5 25.1 7.27 64.5 3.3 6.5 29.7 35.9 8.6 2.2 0.4<br />

Ro1-2 Cu Clnr 1 Conc. 3.0 8.94 3.61 1.87 7.40 0.70 14.3 19.3 14.2 76.5 23.8 13.8 50.7 43.2 14.3 4.4 2.0<br />

Rghr 1-2 Conc 9.5 3.09 2.88 1.27 3.16 0.26 8.29 15.3 19.6 83.1 59.8 29.6 68.2 51.2 26.2 10.9 8.5<br />

Rghr 1-5 Conc 21.6 1.50 1.71 1.37 1.78 0.15 8.38 17.9 19.0 92.0 81.1 73.0 87.5 67.7 60.5 29.2 18.8<br />

4.1.5. Locked Cycle Testing<br />

Based on the metallurgical performance and expectation from the mineralogical information, one locked<br />

cycle test was conducted to provide more definitive performance information by re-circulation of middling<br />

streams and the projection of concentrate grades and recoveries that would be realized from a<br />

continuous process. The conditions for the locked cycle test were kept the same as the batch test F12.<br />

Aero 3477 was added to the grind and guar gum and CMC were used in the cleaner stages. The 1 st<br />

cleaner scavenger stage was dropped in this test since not enough gangue material is rejected to ever<br />

SGS Minerals Services<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!