01.06.2013 Views

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

Wellgreen Project Preliminary Economic Assessment ... - OTCIQ.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cu Rec, %<br />

Pt Rec, %<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

Prophecy Platinum Corporation – <strong>Wellgreen</strong> Property – <strong>Project</strong> 50149-001<br />

Cu Rec vs Mass Pull grind/CMC<br />

70<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Wt%<br />

Pt Rec vs Mass Pull grind/CMC<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Wt%<br />

F3 90<br />

F5 50<br />

F6 144<br />

F8 90-CMC<br />

F3 90<br />

F5 50<br />

F6 144<br />

F8 90-CMC<br />

Ni Rec, %<br />

Pd Rec, %<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

SGS Minerals Services<br />

Ni Rec vs Mass Pull grind/CMC<br />

40<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Wt%<br />

Pd Rec vs Mass Pull grind/CMC<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Wt%<br />

Figure 18: Recovery Grind Relationship<br />

The following conclusions can be made from the test results:<br />

F3 90<br />

F5 50<br />

F6 144<br />

F8 90-CMC<br />

F3 90<br />

F5 50<br />

F6 144<br />

F8 90-CMC<br />

• Copper recovery slightly increased with finer grind size over the range tested. The response was<br />

as expected with respect to copper metallurgy in Figure 2, with the grade/recovery relationship<br />

generally improving with finer grind. A maximum rougher recovery of 96% was reached with K80 of<br />

50 µm. A plausible explanation is that at the finer grind, the chalcopyrite is better liberated,<br />

resulting in faster kinetics at the finer grind.<br />

• Effect of grinding on nickel recovery is not similar to copper and finer grinding does not appear to<br />

improve recovery or selectivity, but may even be detrimental to Ni recovery over the range<br />

tested. Nickel metallurgy is shown in Figure 17 where the finer grind resulted in almost the same<br />

recovery as the coarser grind.<br />

• Referring to Table 8 a <strong>com</strong>mon trend is noticed, which is not limited to the effect of grind test<br />

series but to all rougher kinetics tests <strong>com</strong>pleted, that a final rougher tailings Ni assay value of<br />

~0.11% Ni is often reached. This is because there is some Ni in the silicates as well as some<br />

pentlandite texture/associations which can not be recovered. It also shows that the Pt losses<br />

tend to be highest. The mineralogy by Terra shows that Pt is primarily associated with pyrrhotite.<br />

• Nickel rougher recovery barely reached more than 82%. This is expected since as it was stated<br />

previously, about some of the nickel is expected to be associated with silicate minerals and is not<br />

expected to float. The copper and nickel rougher concentrate grade ranged from 1.5%-1.8% and<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!