04.04.2014 Views

0 - The Black Vault

0 - The Black Vault

0 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ti<br />

THE BOM CORPORATION<br />

.3. Concepts for Planning Withdrawal at the Field Command 22/<br />

By way of background, the MACV staff had prepared contirigency<br />

plans for a number of probable circumstances, such as troop withdrawials<br />

Jnder non-hostile conditions that would take place if the Paris Peace Talks<br />

were successful and hostilities were terminated, <strong>The</strong>re was no long-range<br />

planning by the staff, however, for redeployment of forces under continued<br />

conditions cf hostilities, Analysis of the president's announcements<br />

clearly revealed his intent to drawdown US<br />

force levels in South Vietnam at<br />

a fairly steep rate to show the American public substantial progress with<br />

his Vietnamization program by the 1972 election year.<br />

Unfortunately, the field command, MACV, had to continue to implement<br />

the campaign plan with no advance knowledge of when the president<br />

would arnounce the next withdrawal,<br />

the amount of croops involved, or the<br />

period of time available to MACV for execution of the president's decision.<br />

Prior to the development of a long-range redeployment plan,<br />

earlier, the withdrawal planning effort was<br />

referred to<br />

conducted in a reactive and<br />

hasty planning mode. At most, COMUSMACV was advised less then 24 hours<br />

before the announcement was to be made.<br />

Within hours following the presidential<br />

announcement the joint staff would request MACV to advise or the<br />

units designated to redeploy, strengths and spaces involved, redeployment<br />

dates and impact assessments. Needless to say, this hasty reactive planning<br />

and implementation of redeployments within a constrained time frame, while<br />

concurrently conducting military operations, was disruptive,<br />

and not without risk to the continued security of the command..<br />

At the field command level, the guidance of COMUSMACV was essentially<br />

as follows:<br />

inefficient<br />

ensure that a balanced force concept was maintained<br />

throughout the redeployment period; as ground ccmbat forces depart, ensure<br />

the maintena.nce of capabilities essential for strategic and tactical combat<br />

air sorties -- these were to be the only reserve immediately available to<br />

the commander for influencing operations when necessary; and ensure that<br />

the US units withdrawn do not eliminate a mission-capability requirement of<br />

the approved RVNAF force structure.<br />

Ai<br />

6-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!