04.04.2014 Views

0 - The Black Vault

0 - The Black Vault

0 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-~ow -r 4, ~vr~<br />

THE BDM CORPORATION<br />

INSIGHTS<br />

Negotiations 0 During President Johnson's Admininstration, the<br />

hope for ending the war depended on being successful<br />

on the battlefield. Achieving a position of<br />

military strength became the US prerequisite for<br />

negotiations. This strategy suffered from two<br />

disabilities: (a) the nature of guerrilla warfare;<br />

and (b) the asymmetry in the definition of<br />

what constituted acceptable losses. As a result,<br />

American/FWMAF military successes could not be<br />

translated into permanent political advantage.<br />

0 President Nixon and Mr. Kissinger recognized that<br />

a military solution for the war was not available;<br />

therefore they set about to attain a stalemate on<br />

the battlefield, to caLse the DRV to be isolated<br />

from their communist benefactors and to arrive at<br />

a political solutic" in the negotiations.<br />

• As a venture in si~rategic persuasion, the early<br />

bombing of North Vietnam did not work. Limited<br />

and graduated air attacks met with little success.<br />

<strong>The</strong> symbolic rationale for bombing halts backfired<br />

and the DRV used negotiations as a means to get<br />

the bombing stopped. Only when the president<br />

decided to go with a heavy bombardment of Hanoi/<br />

Haiphong in December 1972, did US airpower prove<br />

its effectivenes; in getting the DRV to negotiate<br />

in earnest.<br />

* When negotiating a settlement on behalf of our<br />

allies and ourselves as we did in Vietnam, the US<br />

must not only be actively cognizant of their<br />

established negotiating positions, but also of<br />

their input at,, reactions to alternatives.<br />

Early on, American leadership mistakenly believed<br />

Vietnam to be vital not for itself, but for what<br />

they thought its "loss" would mean internationally<br />

and domesticaily. It also meant that US leaders<br />

wanted a negotiated settlement without fully realizing<br />

(though probably more than tneir critics)<br />

that a civil war cannot be ended by political<br />

compromise alone. <strong>The</strong> attainment of a stalemate<br />

on the battlefield and the effective isolation of<br />

the enemy from their suppliers were the keys to<br />

bringing the negotiations to a conclusion. It was<br />

unfortunate that US military strength had no<br />

political corollary in RVN. <strong>The</strong> fact that the<br />

agreement failed to stop the DRV and the PRG from<br />

eventually pursuing their ultimate goal -- military<br />

victory over the South -- reinforces this<br />

insight.<br />

EX-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!