29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 2<br />

From this figure, the most conservative calculated estimate <strong>of</strong> the 1000 year acceleration at the WIPP<br />

facility is seen to be approximately 0.075g. The geologic and seismic assumptions leading to this<br />

1000-year peak acceleration include the consideration <strong>of</strong> a Richter magnitude 5.5 earthquake at the site, a<br />

6.0 magnitude earthquake on the Central Basin Platform, and a 7.8 magnitude earthquake in the Basin<br />

and Range subregion. These magnitudes correspond roughly to equivalent epicentral intensity events <strong>of</strong><br />

VII, VIII and XI on the Modified Mercalli intensity scale. 8 These values, especially the first two, are<br />

considered quite conservative, and the other parameters used in the 0.075g derivation are also very<br />

conservatively chosen. For additional conservatism, a peak design acceleration <strong>of</strong> 0.1g is selected for the<br />

WIPP facility DBE. The design response spectra for vertical and horizontal motions are taken from<br />

Regulatory Guide 1.60 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission) 46 with the high frequency asymptote<br />

scaled to this 0.1g peak acceleration value. These response spectra are shown in Figures 3.2-2 and 3.2-3.<br />

This DBE and the risk analysis that serves an important role in its definition are directly applicable to<br />

Design Class II and IIIA confinement structures and components at the WIPP Facility. Underground<br />

structures and components are Design Class IIIB and as such are not subject to DBE. Mine experience<br />

and studies on earthquake damage to underground facilities 47 show that tunnels, mines, wells, etc., are<br />

not damaged for sites having peak accelerations at the surface below 0.2g.<br />

Design Class IIIB underground facilities do not require the consideration <strong>of</strong> seismic effects based on the<br />

above, and seismic load combinations with increased allowable stresses will not control the design.<br />

2.5-19 January 24, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!