29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 4<br />

Presently, only the construction <strong>of</strong> these areas is planned. The above drifts extend from S-1600 to<br />

S-3650 (i.e., 2,050 ft [625 m] long). Crosscuts (east-west entries) will be 20 ft (6.1 m) wide by 13 ft<br />

(4 m) high by 470 ft (143 m) long. The layout <strong>of</strong> these excavations is shown on Figure 4.1-3.<br />

Panel 1 is the first panel to be used for waste disposal, and was excavated from 1986 through 1988. Its<br />

rooms and access drifts have been rock-bolted to assure stability. Panel 1 has been re-bolted with<br />

threaded bar resin anchors. In addition, Room 1 has been supplied with a supplementary ro<strong>of</strong>-support<br />

system consisting <strong>of</strong> rock bolts, steel channel sets, and a wire-mesh and lacing system. The <strong>DOE</strong> intends<br />

to mine panels in the following order:<br />

Final ½ Panel 10 (access drifts for Panels 1,2,7, and 8)<br />

Panel 2<br />

Panel 9 (access drifts for Panels 3,4,5 and 6)<br />

Panel 3<br />

Panel 4<br />

Panels 5 through 8<br />

At normal operating (waste throughput) rates, rock bolting in Panels 2 through 8 may only be required<br />

locally (i.e. spot bolting). Rock fixtures used at WIPP comply with 30 CFR 57, 1 Subpart B. Each<br />

ground control support system installation is individually assessed and evaluated. As a result they vary<br />

from time to time and place to place.<br />

A discussion <strong>of</strong> the design life <strong>of</strong> underground disposal rooms is included in Section 4.3.9. An<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the effective life <strong>of</strong> the underground rooms in Panel 1 was performed during April 1991, by<br />

a panel <strong>of</strong> geotechnical experts. The panel members concluded that if no additional remedial measures<br />

were taken, the rooms in the panel would likely have a total life <strong>of</strong> seven to eleven years from the time <strong>of</strong><br />

excavation using the installed ro<strong>of</strong> support system, consisting <strong>of</strong> patterned mechanically anchored<br />

rockbolts. Experience in Panel 1 confirmed the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the expert panel.<br />

Plans call for bolt systems installed in the future to equal or exceed the bearing characteristics <strong>of</strong> the bolts<br />

used in the primary pattern in Panel 1. The configuration <strong>of</strong> Panel 2 through 8 will be similar to Panel 1,<br />

therefore; the performance <strong>of</strong> these rooms should be similar to those in Panel 1. Supplementary support<br />

systems will further extend the effective life <strong>of</strong> the rooms, should they be required. A detailed discussion<br />

<strong>of</strong> initial and supplementary support systems is included in Section 4.3.9.<br />

The support system will be subjected to longitudinal and lateral loading due to the rock deformation.<br />

The anchorage components may undergo lateral deformation due to <strong>of</strong>fsetting along clay seams or<br />

fractures and increasing tensile loading. Rigid, non-yielding support systems are not designed to<br />

accommodate salt creep; however, they do respond to creep and continue to provide support during<br />

ductile behavior. Yielding support systems are currently being evaluated in the WIPP underground.<br />

These systems are designed to yield at predetermined loads, and provide support over their prescribed<br />

yield interval without maintenance. Preliminary data indicate that the design and performance <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong><br />

these systems are clearly superior to rigid systems in their ability to respond to salt creep while<br />

maintaining adequate ground support.<br />

Because the disposal area access drifts must remain open and operational for a much longer period than<br />

any panel, they will require additional consideration from time to time. They are subject to regular and<br />

systematic inspection and evaluation, and appropriate ground control measures will be implemented<br />

whenever necessary.<br />

4.2-26 January 28, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!