29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 5<br />

The DR in this case is determined based on the amount <strong>of</strong> damage the waste drum receives as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

the impact and how much <strong>of</strong> the contents are exposed. As discussed in Section 5.2.1.1, the shield plug is<br />

approximately four times the 1000 pound weight <strong>of</strong> a waste drum, it is assumed that the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shield plug on a waste drum would result in a DR four times the DR for dropping a 1000 pound waste<br />

drum from the same height. For this event it is conservatively assumed that the DR = 0.1 (4 x 0.025 ).<br />

Estimated Noninvolved Worker and MEI Consequences and Comparison to Risk Evaluation Guidelines -<br />

Based on the values for the source term variables as presented above, the worst-case, no-mitigation MEI<br />

and noninvolved worker consequences (Appendix E Tables E-22 and E-23) <strong>of</strong> NC3-A are well within the<br />

radiological and non-radiological risk evaluation guidelines for the unlikely range. The non-radiological<br />

results meet the guidelines (i.e., the sum <strong>of</strong> ratios < 1) when all the chemicals are added (Tables E-24 and<br />

E-25).<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Immediate Worker Consequences - No immediate worker consequences are calculated for<br />

NC3-A because no workers are in the Hot Cell where the event occurs.<br />

NC3-B Dropped Object on <strong>Waste</strong> Material Outside Hot Cell Accident Scenario:<br />

NC3-B is composed <strong>of</strong> events 4G-1 and 5BD-1, which involve the dropping <strong>of</strong> an object during waste<br />

handling operations outside the Hot Cell.<br />

Hazardous event 4G-1 postulates dropping a 10-160B cask lid onto the cask and its drums. The causes <strong>of</strong><br />

this event are human error and equipment failure. The frequency <strong>of</strong> event 4G-1 is a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 10-160B casks that are processed each year and the probability <strong>of</strong> a cask lid being dropped<br />

while it is being removed. The maximum number <strong>of</strong> 10-160B casks that will be processed in one year is<br />

208. Therefore, a 10-160B cask lid will be removed by using the crane in the Hot Cell 208 times a year.<br />

From Table D-9 <strong>of</strong> the WIPP CH SAR 6 , the probability <strong>of</strong> a crane drop per lift due to all mechanisms is<br />

3.4E-06. The frequency <strong>of</strong> event 4G-1 is: 208 lifts/year * 3.4E-06 = 7.1E-04/year or "unlikely" (10 -2 /yr<br />

$frequency >10 -4 /yr).<br />

Hazardous event 5BD-1 postulates dropping the drum carriage lifting fixture onto the drums. The causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> this event are human error and equipment failure. The frequency <strong>of</strong> event 5BD-1 is a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> 10-160B casks processed each year and the probability <strong>of</strong> dropping the drum carriage lifting<br />

fixture while preparing to remove the waste drum carriages from the cask. 208 10-160B casks will be<br />

processed in one year is 208. Since there are two drum carriages in each 10-160B cask, the total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> times the drum carriage lifting fixture will be used is 416 per year. From Table D-9 <strong>of</strong> the WIPP CH<br />

SAR 6 , the probability <strong>of</strong> a crane drop per lift due to all mechanisms is 3.4E-06. The frequency <strong>of</strong> event<br />

5BD-1 is: 416 lifts/year * 3.4E-06 = 1.4E-03/year or "unlikely" (10 -2 /yr $frequency >10 -4 /yr).<br />

It is assumed that each <strong>of</strong> these individual events is independent, then the frequency <strong>of</strong> the Dropped<br />

Object on <strong>Waste</strong> Material Outside Hot Cell event can be assumed to be equivalent to the highest<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> the individual events for the purposes <strong>of</strong> determining which Evaluation Guidelines apply.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the events <strong>of</strong> NC3-B has a frequency in the "unlikely" range (10 -2 /yr $frequency >10 -4 /yr). The<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> NC3-B are compared against the Evaluation Guidelines for the "unlikely" frequency<br />

range.<br />

5.2-56 January 22, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!