29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 5<br />

For waste drum and/or canister breach scenarios resulting from drops or impacts, the accident is<br />

characterized by a sharp impact to the waste drum and/or canister and damage to the waste canister,<br />

followed by an airborne release <strong>of</strong> radioactivity due to shock/vibration effects. The waste forms defined<br />

in the BIR 5 were examined to determine the types most susceptible to waste canister breach scenarios.<br />

Based on <strong>DOE</strong>-HDBK-3010-94, 4 non-combustible waste forms that have a hard, unyielding surface and<br />

do not undergo brittle fracture are the most susceptible to the airborne release <strong>of</strong> radioactivity in highly<br />

respirable form due to shock/vibration effects. Although <strong>DOE</strong>-HDBK-3010-94 4 bounding airborne<br />

release fraction for combustible and non-combustible waste is the same (1E-03), the respirable fraction is<br />

higher for noncombustibles (1.0) than for combustibles (0.1). Therefore, it is conservatively assumed<br />

that the breach accident scenarios occur with waste drums and/or canisters classified as containing<br />

non-combustible uncategorized metal waste, with a 95 percent non-combustible and 5 percent<br />

combustible content. As discussed earlier, at most two waste drums containing the entire radionuclide<br />

inventory from two 10-160B casks may be at risk <strong>of</strong> damage from a breach accident. Therefore, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> drums impacted (CD = 1 or CD = 2) is determined by the specifics <strong>of</strong> the accident scenario.<br />

Uncategorized metal waste is chosen for drop and impact scenarios due to: (1) the relatively high waste<br />

volume fraction (approximately 9 percent) <strong>of</strong> the total stored waste volume, and (2) the combustible and<br />

non-combustible fractions from the definition <strong>of</strong> the waste form in the BIR 5 . Although heterogeneous<br />

waste has the highest stored volume fraction (approximately 59 percent), based on the definitions in the<br />

BIR, uncategorized metal waste has the highest projected volume fraction (approximately 77 percent) and<br />

highest potential fraction <strong>of</strong> non-combustible waste fraction (95 percent), and is therefore more<br />

conservative for use in accident analysis calculations.<br />

Based on the data in Table A-1 <strong>of</strong> Appendix A, use <strong>of</strong> the above values for CI and combustible/noncombustible<br />

fractions provides reasonable assurance <strong>of</strong> obtaining bounding consequences in the potential<br />

fire, explosion, and waste drum and/or canister breach accident consequence analysis.<br />

The non-radiological CI development process for events which involve a breach <strong>of</strong> a waste canister or<br />

drum is simplified by assuming that 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the VOC headspace inventory is released<br />

instantaneously. VOCs selected for consideration for accidental releases are listed in Table 5.1-2. The<br />

values were scaled for estimating concentrations in the waste drum or canister based on the volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />

container.<br />

Solid and liquid chemical concentrations that would be expected to be within a waste drum or canister is<br />

the same as for CH waste and are listed in Table 5.1-3. These values were scaled for estimating<br />

concentrations in the waste canister based on bounding weight <strong>of</strong> material in a waste canister.<br />

Radiological and chemical source terms developed for specific accidents are estimated using Equation<br />

5-1.<br />

For the radiological CI, the CD is limited to either 1 or 2 as discussed previously. However, for the<br />

non-radiological inventory, all <strong>of</strong> the waste drums are assumed to contain equal inventories. Therefore,<br />

as many as 20 waste drums could be at risk for damage and release <strong>of</strong> non-radiological hazardous<br />

material. The CD is determined for each <strong>of</strong> the accident scenarios on the basis <strong>of</strong> the specifics for the<br />

scenario. Note that this means that the CD for the radiological and non-radiological releases may be<br />

different for the same accident scenario.<br />

5.2-5 January 22, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!