29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 5<br />

The ultimate safety objective <strong>of</strong> the first, or primary layer <strong>of</strong> WIPP defense-in-depth is accident<br />

prevention. The reduction <strong>of</strong> risk (as the product <strong>of</strong> frequency and consequence) to both workers and the<br />

public from WIPP RH TRU waste handling and emplacement operations is primarily achieved by<br />

reducing the frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> postulated abnormal events or accidents. The conservative<br />

design <strong>of</strong> the facility’s SSCs, with operations conducted by trained/qualified personnel to the standards<br />

set forth in approved procedures, provides the first layer. Specific preventative measures are identified in<br />

Appendix C for each postulated deviation as identified in the HAZOPs, 4,5 and in Table 5.1-10 for each<br />

deviation considered for quantitative accident analysis.<br />

The occurrence frequency for each postulated deviation as identified in the HAZOPs, 4,5 and in<br />

Table 5.1-10 for each deviation considered for quantitative accident analysis, is primarily derived from<br />

the initiating event. To reduce the frequency <strong>of</strong> equipment failure, the facility design, fabrication, and<br />

construction will be undertaken in accordance with applicable codes and standards, based on the design<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> SSCs established in Chapter 4. Extensive pre-operational tests will be conducted to<br />

verify that SSCs perform their design function. This will be followed by in-service and pre-operational<br />

checks and inspections, and preventive maintenance and quality assurance programs.<br />

The WIPP employs configuration management change control and modification retest to ensure quality<br />

throughout facility life. For hazards associated with underground operations, a substantial array <strong>of</strong><br />

ground control planning and practices, support systems, instrumentation, monitoring, and evaluation<br />

exist to reduce the frequency <strong>of</strong> potential Underground accidents. Technical Safety Requirement (TSR)<br />

Administrative Controls (ACs) are derived in Chapter 6 and required in the WIPP TSR Document<br />

(Attachment 1 to the SAR) to ensure that the high level <strong>of</strong> design is maintained throughout the facility<br />

lifetime.<br />

Additionally, as identified in the HAZOPs, 4,5 accident prevention for process inherent events, is achieved<br />

administratively through the RH WAC 10 which restricts waste elements (such as the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

pyrophorics) which may be initiating events for accidents.<br />

The following provide administrative controls to prevent the risk from postulated accidents from being<br />

unacceptable: (1) RH WAC limits on the radionuclide and fissile content <strong>of</strong> each waste canister, (2)<br />

waste canister integrity provisions ensure the robustness reflected in the waste canister accident release<br />

analyses, and (3) criticality safety is a designed in-storage and handling configuration that ensures (in<br />

conjunction with waste characteristics ) that active criticality control is not required.<br />

Prevention <strong>of</strong> human error as an initiating event is achieved by the extensive training and qualification<br />

programs, operational procedures, and conduct <strong>of</strong> operations programs. TSR ACs are derived in Chapter<br />

6 and required in the WIPP TSR Document (Attachment 1 to the SAR) to ensure that these programs are<br />

maintained, and operations continue to be conducted with highly qualified and trained personnel using<br />

current approved procedures.<br />

The second layer <strong>of</strong> defense-in-depth provides protection against anticipated and unlikely operational<br />

events that might occur in spite <strong>of</strong> the protection afforded by the first layer <strong>of</strong> defense. The second<br />

defense layer is characterized by detection and protection systems, and controls that: (1) indicate<br />

component, system, or process performance degradation created by compromises <strong>of</strong> the first layer, and<br />

(2) provide adequate mitigation and accommodation <strong>of</strong> the consequences <strong>of</strong> those operational accidents<br />

which may occur.<br />

5.1-19 January 22, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!