29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 5<br />

Hazardous event 11D-1 postulates a fire in the Hot Cell that causes the release <strong>of</strong> radioactive materials.<br />

The fire is postulated to occur during the transfer <strong>of</strong> the waste drums to the facility canister. Part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process is welding the lid to a facility canister. The possible cause <strong>of</strong> the fire is ignition <strong>of</strong> combustibles<br />

inside a facility canister due to heat generated by welding. This event is different from Event 9-1 in that<br />

the fire is internal to the waste drum. The potential release is limited to the waste drums in a facility<br />

canister being prepared for disposal. At the time the 10-160B HAZOP was performed, the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />

facility canister required the lid to be welded to the canister body. The facility canister design was<br />

changed so that the lid mechanically locks to the canister body and welding is no longer performed.<br />

Since welding is no longer performed, further analysis will not be performed on event 11D-1.<br />

Preventive and Mitigative Features - General preventive and mitigative measures identified in the<br />

HAZOP for this specific scenario are listed in Table 5.1-10.<br />

Estimated Frequency - The HAZOP Team qualitatively estimated the frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> a fire in<br />

the Hot Cell to be in the anticipated range (10 -1 /yr $frequency >10 -2 /yr) for hazardous event 9-1.<br />

However, based on a quantitative evaluation using conservative assumptions documented in Appendix A<br />

and below, the overall frequency <strong>of</strong> the fire in the Hot Cell while containing stored waste (event 9-1) is<br />

extremely unlikely (10 -4 $frequency >10 -6 /yr). The following assumptions are used in this analysis:<br />

C<br />

Drums meet WIPP WAC for flammable gases<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

Combustible materials program will limit the combustible materials in the Hot Cell<br />

The Hot Cell walls constitute an effective fire barrier to keep a fire originating outside the Hot<br />

Cell from propagating to the Hot Cell<br />

No more than 2080 waste drums from 10-160B casks are processed through the Hot Cell in one<br />

year<br />

This accident is initiated by hazardous event 9-1. The frequency or estimated annual likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> Event 9-1is determined by the following factors:<br />

C<br />

The likelihood that an electrical short occurs in the Hot Cell that initiates a fire.<br />

C<br />

C<br />

The likelihood that there is sufficient combustible material in the Hot Cell to generate sufficient<br />

heat to ignite the contents <strong>of</strong> a waste drum.<br />

The likelihood that there is sufficient oxidant in the drum to support a sustained fire.<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> a fire occurring in the Hot Cell can be estimated as:<br />

Frequency <strong>of</strong> Fire (per year) = Probability <strong>of</strong> electrical short igniting fire x Probability <strong>of</strong> sufficient<br />

combustible material in Hot Cell to ignite drum contents x Probability <strong>of</strong> sufficient oxidant x Number <strong>of</strong><br />

drums handled per year<br />

5.2-48 January 22, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!