29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 5<br />

The crushing scenarios were modeled to produce rupture, or almost rupture in order to determine the<br />

force required to produce a release. A force <strong>of</strong> 11,000 lbs on the shuttle car with a canister partially in<br />

the road cask/shielded insert would be required to produce a bending that does not cause rupture in the<br />

canister. This is much more than the force <strong>of</strong> approximately 2000 lbs required to move the shuttle car<br />

between transfer positions. A second crushing scenario involved accidental closing <strong>of</strong> a shield valve on a<br />

canister. Calculations show that 39 kips (almost 20 tons) <strong>of</strong> force must be exerted by a shield valve<br />

closure in order to initiate a canister rupture. The force required to simply open and close the shield<br />

valve is approximately 500 lbs. Passive and active engineered design features which prevent these<br />

scenarios from occurring are described in section 5.2.3.3.<br />

For the waste hoist accident scenario which involves a facility cask, containing a waste canister, drop <strong>of</strong><br />

over 2,000 ft (609.6 m), it is conservatively assumed that breach <strong>of</strong> the facility cask and waste canister<br />

occurs resulting in a bounding DR <strong>of</strong> 0.25 for direct loaded waste and 0.025 for double confined waste.<br />

Airborne Release (ARF) and Respirable (RF) Fractions<br />

Based on the discussion in Section A.3.2 <strong>of</strong> Appendix A <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOE</strong>-STD-3009-94, 1 bounding values for the<br />

ARFs and the RFs are utilized based on <strong>DOE</strong>-HDBK-3010-94. 4 The ARF for the burning <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminated combustible materials in a waste canister is 5.0E-04 and the ARF for non-combustible<br />

materials in a canister is 6.0E-03. These values represent bounding ARFs for the burning <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminated packaged mixed waste and the heating <strong>of</strong> non-combustible contaminated surfaces<br />

(<strong>DOE</strong>-HDBK-3010-94, subsections 5.2.1.1 and 5.3.1). 4 The bounding RFs for the burning <strong>of</strong><br />

contaminated packaged mixed waste and the heating <strong>of</strong> non-combustible contaminated surfaces are 1.0<br />

and 1.0E-02, respectively (<strong>DOE</strong>-HDBK-3010-94, subsection 5.2.1.1 and 5.3.1). 4 . The bounding value<br />

for ARF for burning <strong>of</strong> contaminated packaged mixed waste is a conservative value. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conservative factors involved in the determination <strong>of</strong> the ARF as they apply to this analysis include:<br />

Ç<br />

The experiments on which the determination <strong>of</strong> ARF are based were designed to represent loosely<br />

packed waste in cardboard boxes. The waste drums that will be temporarily stored in the Hot<br />

Cell are much more substantial (DOT Type A containers). Therefore, the experiments described<br />

in <strong>DOE</strong>-HDBK-3010-94 4 used to determine the ARF for burning <strong>of</strong> packaged combustible waste<br />

is conservative for the case being analyzed here.<br />

Ç<br />

Ç<br />

Ç<br />

Gram quantities were used in the experiments rather than kilogram quantities in the RH waste<br />

containers. The gram quantities <strong>of</strong> material in the experiments did not provide the depth <strong>of</strong> burn<br />

residue that may attenuate the airborne releases from large quantities <strong>of</strong> material. The waste in<br />

the waste drums in this analysis is representative <strong>of</strong> large quantities <strong>of</strong> material (up to 1000 lbs<br />

(454 kg) per drum). Additionally, the packaging <strong>of</strong> the waste in a DOT Type A container will<br />

limit the area <strong>of</strong> the waste material exposed to the flame. The experiments described in <strong>DOE</strong>-<br />

HDBK-3010-94 4 used to determine the CARF for combustible packaged waste are conservative<br />

for the accidents analyzed in this SAR.<br />

The radionuclides in the experiments were freshly applied and emphasized the goal <strong>of</strong><br />

maximizing release. The experimental configuration did not allow the contaminant material to<br />

attain the degree <strong>of</strong> adhesion and packing expected for real stored waste and are, therefore,<br />

conservative for the accidents analyzed here.<br />

The experimental configuration, from which the ARF values were obtained, consisted <strong>of</strong> burning<br />

pre-contaminated wastes packaged in plastic bags, sealed in an 18 in x 18 in x 24 in cardboard<br />

box on a grill in a 10 ft diameter by 10 ft high stainless steel vessel. In the accidents analyzed<br />

here, the volume in which the fire occurs is the Hot Cell which is much larger than the steel<br />

vessel used in the experiments.<br />

5.2-8 January 22, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!