29.11.2014 Views

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

DOE 2000. - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WIPP RH PSAR <strong>DOE</strong>/WIPP-03-3174 CHAPTER 5<br />

C<br />

Maximum time to transfer one waste canister to the emplacement equipment in the Underground<br />

is approximately 4 hours<br />

The defense-in-depth SSCs which are applicable to this scenario, per the criteria in Chapter 3, Section<br />

3.1.3 are assigned as follows:<br />

C<br />

Vented DOT Type A (or equivalent) waste canister - primary confinement<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

Underground Ventilation Exhaust System - secondary confinement<br />

Radiation Monitoring System (active waste disposal room exit alpha CAM for underground shift<br />

to filtration) - secondary confinement<br />

Underground Ventilation Exhaust HEPA Filters - secondary confinement<br />

Central Monitoring System (for actuation <strong>of</strong> underground shift to filtration only) - secondary<br />

confinement<br />

Forklift and Attachments - Designed to minimize waste canister drops<br />

Design <strong>of</strong> facility cask - Prevents/minimizes releases from the waste canister<br />

The defense-in-depth ACs which are applicable to this scenario, per the criteria in Chapter 3, Section<br />

3.1.3 are assigned as follows:<br />

C<br />

No other vehicle movement is allowed during RH waste movement in the Underground.<br />

Section 5.2.4.1, Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Design Basis, discusses in greater detail: (1) the evaluation <strong>of</strong> safety<br />

SSCs, and (2) the applicability <strong>of</strong> functional and performance requirements (system evaluation) and<br />

controls (TSRs). Detailed design descriptions for the above defense-in-depth SSCs may be found in the<br />

applicable SDDs as referenced in Chapter 4.<br />

Due to the importance <strong>of</strong> WIPP programs relating to configuration and document control, quality<br />

assurance, conduct <strong>of</strong> operations, preventative maintenance and inspection, waste handling procedures<br />

and training, the WIPP RH WAC, and the WIPP Emergency Management Program 36 and associated<br />

procedures, in the WIPP defense-in-depth strategy for this accident, TSR ACs are derived in Chapter 6<br />

and required in the WIPP TSR Document.<br />

5.2.3.6 RH5 Fire Followed by Explosion in the Underground<br />

Scenario Description - The HAZOP 28 postulated a fire followed by explosion in the Underground. The<br />

HAZOP 28 postulated two hazardous events (9-8 and 10-3) that could result in a fire followed by<br />

explosion in the Underground. The fire and subsequent explosion could cause a significant release <strong>of</strong><br />

radioactivity.<br />

Hazardous event 9-8 postulated a diesel fuel fire followed by explosion on forklift during the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

facility cask to disposal room. The forklift usually has about 20 gals (75.7 L) <strong>of</strong> diesel fuel. The cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> this event is a diesel fuel leak. An ignition source could ignite the fuel and cause a fire and then a<br />

subsequent explosion. The fire and subsequent explosion could potentially damage the facility cask and<br />

waste canister and cause a breach <strong>of</strong> the waste canister because neither the facility cask or the waste<br />

canister are qualified for a fire or explosion. The thermal and explosive stress on the waste canister could<br />

5.2-38 January 22, 2003

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!