23.11.2012 Views

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 The fourth century 33<br />

that had been lost in 298 but also all of Mesopotamia and Armenia. It is<br />

possible that the king followed a far-reaching and programmatic foreign<br />

policy which included the restoration of the former Achaemenid Empire<br />

as far as the Strymon river (2). 78 Although Persia struggled with a period of<br />

political unrest after the death of Hormizd II, Rome kept to the agreement<br />

of 298 and thus missed a good opportunity for a military attack. ˇ Sāpūr II was<br />

still a child when he took over the throne but soon managed to consolidate<br />

his reign – the longest and one of the most renowned reigns of all Sasanian<br />

kings. The year 338 was an important turning-point because at this time<br />

hostilities with Rome started again. Changes in religious affairs that had<br />

occurred within the Roman Empire dramatically affected the relationship<br />

between the two great powers. The reign of Constantine the Great (306–37)<br />

ushered in the turning-point known as the ‘Constantinian Revolution’. 79<br />

Since his victory over Maxentius (306–12) at the Milvian Bridge in the<br />

year 312 Constantine had been convinced that the well-being of the Roman<br />

Empire depended on its protection by the Christian God. From 312 onwards<br />

non-Christian religions were therefore repressed and the Christianisation<br />

of the Roman Empire took place at a much accelerated pace. The fact that<br />

Constantine turned to Christianity and furthered this religion in state and<br />

society encouraged the Christians in Persia to bond even more than before<br />

with their fellow-believers in the Roman Empire. 80 The more Constantine<br />

felt responsible for the well-being also of the Persian Christians, the more<br />

they became the natural allies of the Western arch enemy in the eyes of<br />

ˇSāpūr II. It is therefore not surprising that when the military confrontations<br />

between the two great powers resumed long-lasting and severe persecutions<br />

of the Christians in Persia began. Numerous acts of martyrs reflect the<br />

suffering of the Christians in this period and illustrate the political character<br />

of the persecutions (31). When Constantine the Great died on 22 May 337<br />

in the middle of his preparations for the Persian War, ˇ Sāpūr II used the<br />

opportunity to conquer Armenia, which had been Christianised since the<br />

beginning of the fourth century. The attack formed a prelude to numerous<br />

armed confrontations between Rome and Persia. 81 These lasted to the death<br />

of Constantius II (337–61), who ruled over the Eastern half of the imperium<br />

Romanum after the death of Constantine. Neither of the two sides gained<br />

any major advantages during this period (7).<br />

78 For the Roman–Persian relations under Sāpūr ˇ II in general see Barceló 1981: 73–104 and Hunt 1998:<br />

11–14, 39–43 and 73–7.<br />

79 See Brandt 1998: 32–4 and Girardet 1998. 80 Blum 1980: 26–7.<br />

81 Blockley 1989: 465–90; on Constantius’ objectives see Warmington 1977: 509–20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!