23.11.2012 Views

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 2 A chronological survey<br />

became more and more visible towards the end of ˇ Sāpūr I’s reign, and<br />

in particular after his death. Although the Christian population displayed<br />

loyalty towards the king in many instances, as a guardian and protector<br />

of Zoroastrianism he was ultimately not allowed to tolerate Christianity<br />

(30). Here we see clear parallels to the developments in the Roman<br />

Empire where reasons of state were also responsible for persecutions of the<br />

Christians.<br />

ˇSāpūr I’s long-standing policy of religious tolerance favoured especially<br />

the rise of Mani, the founder of Manichaeanism, 28 a religion that was for<br />

a short time a religious alternative to Zoroastrianism, but at the end of his<br />

life the king turned to Zoroastrianism. 29 In his Great Inscription ˇ Sāpūr<br />

proclaimed that he owed his political successes entirely to the goodwill of<br />

Ahura Mazda (30). At the beginning of the fourth century Constantine the<br />

Great displayed a similar attitude with regard to the Christian God after<br />

his victories over Maxentius and Licinius. 30 Both rulers propagated their<br />

close relationship with a supreme god in a way that illustrates structural<br />

similarities between their ideas of kingship. On the Eastern side, one is<br />

reminded of the Sasanian reliefs that capture the ‘King of kings’ receiving<br />

the ring, symbol of his divine rule, that is Ahura Mazda handing over<br />

his power to the secular ruler; on the Western side, what comes to mind<br />

are the many images that underline the close link between emperor and<br />

God and show the emperor as the executor of divine plans in the world. 31<br />

Further parallels to the religious situation in Persia can be observed with<br />

regard to the motives, goals and consequences of Constantine’s religious<br />

policy. As the Sasanian kings supported Zoroastrianism a long time before<br />

the conversion of Constantine, religious developments in Persia must have<br />

been significant for the events in the West. 32<br />

It is striking how much ˇ Sāpūr I’s aggressive policy against Rome reinforced<br />

the claims made by the founder of the Sasanian dynasty, Ardaˇsīr<br />

I, namely to rule the territories that had once made up the Achaemenid<br />

Empire (2). During his reign, Sasanian interests in the West reached a high<br />

point for the first time and Rome had to apply all its energies in order to<br />

28 On Mānī and the religion named after him see MacKenzie 1979: 500–31; Hutter 1988; Lieu 1992 and<br />

1994.<br />

29 On Zoroastrianism in the Sasanian Period see Zaehner 1975 and 1961; Duchesne-Guillemin 1983:<br />

866–908 and Boyce 1984a: 101–43 and 1984b.<br />

30 See Brandt 1998: 32–7 and 128–46 for references.<br />

31 One famous example is the silver medallion from Ticinum, which probably dates to the year 315;<br />

see Brandt 1998: 135–7.<br />

32 Paul 1983: 108–12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!