23.11.2012 Views

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 2 A chronological survey<br />

on a one-year armistice, which was later extended (575–8). As Armenia was<br />

excluded from the regulations, warfare continued. Diplomatic efforts did<br />

not bear fruit. As a consequence Xusrō eventually invaded Mesopotamia<br />

even before the armistice had expired. In spite of initial Persian successes in<br />

Armenia and in the Roman part of Mesopotamia139 the Romans were able to<br />

repel the Sasanian king, who finally sought peace. Before ambassadors could<br />

be exchanged Xusrō I Anōˇsarvān died. His son and successor Hormizd IV<br />

(579–90) made demands that – as Tiberius’ envoys claimed – the Romans<br />

could not possibly meet. The state of war continued and lasted throughout<br />

the reign of Hormizd IV, even after on the Roman side Maurice (582–602)<br />

had become emperor. 140<br />

Apart from the war in Mesopotamia Hormizd IV had to deal with the<br />

Turks in the East, the Chazars141 in the North and Arab tribes in the South.<br />

In particular the Western Turks became increasingly dangerous, similar to<br />

the Hephthalites during the fifth century. 142 With great efforts and entirely<br />

owing to the military genius of the Sasanian general Bahrām Čōbīn the<br />

Western Turks were defeated and became tributary allies in 588/9. 143 Next<br />

Bahrām Čōbīn was sent to the Southern regions of the Caucasus so that<br />

he could fight the war against Byzantium from there. Although initially<br />

he was victorious, he suffered a great defeat in the plains of Azerbaijan. 144<br />

Hormizd IV accused him of cowardice and decided to dismiss him. 145 His<br />

decision was to have far-reaching consequences for the course of Sasanian<br />

history and Persian–Roman relations.<br />

Bahrām Čōbīn and his troops reacted with a rebellion and were soon<br />

supported by the Sasanian army in Mesopotamia. 146 Persia was in such<br />

turmoil that Hormizd IV was taken captive and blinded; in the spring of<br />

590 his son Xusrō II Parvēz (590–628) was proclaimed king. 147 His attempts<br />

to reach an agreement with the rebels were to no avail and he fled from the<br />

general, 148 who ascended the Sasanian throne on 9 March 590 and became<br />

King Bahrām VI Čōbīn.149 The latter had already sent envoys to Maurice<br />

139 Honigmann 1935: 22–3. 140 Higgins 1939: 55–70 and Whitby 1988: 250–75 and 276–304.<br />

141 On the Chazars see Golden 1990: 256–84. 142 See Frye 1983a: 156 and Bivar 1983a: 215.<br />

143 Tabarī, tr. Nöldeke, pp. 270–5; Bosworth 301–5 (992–4); on Bahrām Čōbīn see Shahbazi 1989:<br />

519–22; for the confrontations with the Turks see Goubert 1951: 121–3.<br />

144 Theoph. Simoc. iii.7; for a detailed analysis of this battle see Goubert 1951: 123–5.<br />

145 Ibid. iii.8.1. 146 Ibid. iv.1–2.<br />

147 For the chronology of events see Higgins 1939: 51–2; 1955: 97; in general see also Whitby 1988:<br />

292–7.<br />

148 Theoph. Simoc. iv.10.1–11; cf. Frendo 1989: 77–88; on Xusrō II’s escape into Roman territory see<br />

Goubert 1949: 81–98.<br />

149 Theoph. Simoc. iv.12.6; on the date of the crowning see Schreiner 1985: 300–1 n. 573–4 and Whitby<br />

1988: 296.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!