23.11.2012 Views

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 Armenia 183<br />

the influential men and satraps or by surprising others with unexpected raids. (3)<br />

Then he used a carefully calculated mix of flattery and perjury in order to get at<br />

King Arsaces himself. He gave instructions to take the king, who had been invited<br />

to a banquet, to a secret door, to tear his eyes out and to bind him in silver chains,<br />

which among this people is held as a consolation in the punishment of men of<br />

rank, if only a small one; 49 then he had him banished to a fortress called Agabana, 50<br />

where he was tortured and then punished with death by the sword. (4) After that,<br />

so that his perjury would not leave anything undefiled, he expelled Sauromaces,<br />

who ruled over Ibēria by Roman authority, and handed over the rule over the same<br />

people to a certain Aspacures; he even crowned the man in order to show how<br />

much he disrespected our authority. 51<br />

In February of 364 Jovian died unexpectedly and ˇ Sāpūr II embarked on an<br />

offensive against Armenia. 52 In the above passage, Ammianus Marcellinus<br />

criticises the Persian advance sharply. The author emphasises ˇ Sāpūr II’s<br />

aggressive policy and his intention to conquer the areas that his ancestors<br />

had controlled. It is noteworthy that Ammianus’ words contradict his own<br />

account of the peace of 363 (xxv.7.12; 18) according to which the Romans<br />

broke the treaty when they refused to support Armenia in the event of a<br />

Persian invasion. Be that as it may, the Persian king met with strong opposition<br />

in Armenia. Whereas the Armenian Christians tended to support the<br />

West and the still numerous Zoroastrians sided with the Persians, the interests<br />

of the almost independent ‘feudal’ nobles were not as clear cut because<br />

the latter above all wanted to retain their autonomy. Ammianus mentions<br />

that it took ˇ Sāpūr II until 367 to capture and execute the Armenian king<br />

Arsaces, and this only by resorting to a ruse. Arsaces’ son and successor to<br />

the throne, Papās, fled and sought protection from the Roman emperor<br />

Valens. ˇ Sāpūr II mustered a large force and took possession of large parts<br />

of Armenia. He also tried to expand Sasanian influence to the north, into<br />

Ibēria, by deposing Sauromaces, whom Rome had invested with power in<br />

Ibēria, and to install a man of his own choice, a certain Aspacures, as the<br />

new ruler.<br />

Rome reacted to this development without delay. Shortly after the peace<br />

agreement of 363 both powers were at war again. In 371 the armies of<br />

ˇSāpūr II and of the Roman emperor Valens confronted each other in open<br />

49 Cf. Hdt. iii.130 and Curt. v.12.20.<br />

50 Proc. BP i.3.7 mentions this fortress and calls it the ‘place of oblivion’.<br />

51 When Ibēria was to be divided between Sauromaces and Aspacures in 370 (Amm. xxvii.12.16–17)<br />

ˇSāpūr II objected vehemently (Amm. xxx.2.2). The Sasanian king used the war against the Goths<br />

fought by the emperor Valens in order to expel Sauromaces once more from Ibēria in 378 (Amm.<br />

xxx.2.4 and 7).<br />

52 Gutmann 1991: 162–91.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!