23.11.2012 Views

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

Beate Dignas & Engelbert Winter - Kaveh Farrokh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182 6 Shared interests: Continuing conflicts<br />

Galerius over the Sasanians in the year 298 Tiridates had been placed on the<br />

Armenian throne as a Roman client king. Presumably he had supported<br />

Rome’s anti-Christian policy during the reign of Diocletian, and when<br />

he decided to convert to Christianity and the Christian religion became<br />

the official, publicly promoted religion also in the Roman Empire, this<br />

brought the two states even closer. 44 In contrast, the relationship with the<br />

Zoroastrian Sasanian Empire was bound to deteriorate dramatically. 45 The<br />

persecutions of the Christians in the Sasanian Empire that began during<br />

the reign of ˇ Sāpūr II clearly reveal that the relationship between West<br />

and East was changing for the worse after the Constantinian revolution.<br />

Accordingly, Moses of Chorene’s letter of the Armenians to the Roman<br />

emperor Constantius stems from the fear that the Sasanians would renew<br />

their attempts to take possession of the country. The petition for military<br />

support against the claims of the ‘godless Persians’ is now accompanied by<br />

a reference to the emperor’s duty to act as the patron of Christianity as a<br />

whole.<br />

Elsewhere we also hear about the emperor’s all-embracing care for the<br />

Christians, which applied also to the Christians in the Sasanian Empire<br />

and inevitably irritated the Persian king (31). Numerous sources attest to<br />

the continuing confrontations between the followers of the Christian faith<br />

and those of the Zoroastrian fire cult, which provoked intervention by the<br />

great powers in Armenia. The changes with regard to the religious affairs<br />

in Armenia meant that the already explosive situation in this region was<br />

aggravated. It is thus not surprising that ˇ Sāpūr II’s far reaching political<br />

ambitions also took aim at Armenia.<br />

Ammianus Marcellinus xxvii.12.1–4 46<br />

(1) The Persian king, the now aged ˇ Sāpūr (II), 47 who from the very beginning of<br />

his reign had always been tempted by raids, seemed well disposed to us with his<br />

people for a short while after the death of the emperor Julian and after the shameful<br />

peace 48 was struck; but then he spurned the promise of the agreements made under<br />

Jovian and laid his hand on Armenia in order to bring it under his rule as if the<br />

validity of the agreements had been erased. (2) At first he used various tricks and<br />

inflicted fairly light harm on this densely populated country by soliciting some of<br />

44 Again, scholars do not accept this reconstruction of events unanimously; see above, p. 128 with n. 47.<br />

45 According to Chaumont 1987a: 427, ‘Christianization tended to strengthen Armenia’s link with the<br />

Roman Empire and to set back the Iranian cultural influence.’<br />

46 For another English translation that includes the following paragraphs see Greatrex and Lieu 2002:<br />

21–2.<br />

47 The author describes events of the last years of Sāpūr ˇ II’s long reign, the years after 367.<br />

48 This is the peace treaty of 363 which was concluded between Jovian and Sāpūr ˇ II (18).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!