managing solid waste. They are particularly involvedin awareness, waste collection, and street cleaning.Some NGOs have piloted door-to-door collection,composting, and recycling (NEFEJ 2004). Oneemerging concern is the management of hazardouswastes. There is no clear state policy on this. Medicalwaste, obsolete pesticides, batteries, effluent, andbyproducts of industries are the main sources ofhazardous waste. Few health institutions haveautoclaves and incinerators: and where they existthey are quite often not in operation.Urban Environmental ConcernsSolid WasteQuantity and NatureThe municipalities of Nepal generate over 1,350 tonsof solid waste every day. Kathmandu alonegenerates 383 tons/day, slightly less than one-third ofthe total municipal waste. Household wasteconstitutes about 75% of municipal waste. Themunicipal waste varies from 0.11 to 0.93 kg perperson per day, with an average of 0.34 kg per personper day (SWMRMC 2004). The households on theoutskirts of the smaller towns (which, althoughfalling within the municipality boundary, are rural innature) reuse most of their waste for feeding animals(pigs and cattle).With the change in consumption patterns andlifestyle of urban inhabitants, the composition ofsolid waste has been changing over the years, fromtraditional organic materials to papers, plastics, glass,metals, and packaging materials. Even so, about twothirdsof municipal waste is still organic orbiodegradable although the composition varies frommunicipality to municipality. A recent study(SWMRMC 2004) showed the following averagecomposition of the solid waste generated inNepalese municipalities:(i) Organic material 66% by wet weight (with arange of about 39 to 95% from municipality tomunicipality);(ii) Metal, glass, paper, and plastic combined,20% by wet weight (range 5 to 50%); plasticalone constitutes 7.6% (range 1.6% to 21%);(iii) Inert material 9.6% (range 0 to 37%); and(iv) “Other” (including medical waste) about 5%.Management Practices and ConcernsSolid waste is the most conspicuous environmentalproblem across Nepal’s urban areas. According to<strong>ADB</strong> (2000), until the 1980s, municipal solid wastemanagement problems were negligible other than inKathmandu Valley—most of the waste generatedbeing organic and thus managed at the householdlevel.Sweepers clean the streets and open spaces,collecting the waste into roadside heaps usingbrooms, picks, shovels, and wheelbarrows; waste isalso picked up from roadside heaps or bins andtransported to disposal points by tractors and trailers,power-tillers, rickshaws, or other wastetransportation vehicles. However, the solid wastecollection rate is generally low. On average only 35%of municipal waste is collected; but rates vary fromabout 7% to as high as 86% from one municipality toanother (SWMRMC 2004). Disposal of waste ishaphazard. Even the capital city dumped wastealong the riverbanks until very recently. Almost allmunicipalities currently lack any landfill site; Pokharamunicipality started disposing of solid waste at alandfill site after a long negotiation with the peopleresiding in the neighborhood, and the Solid WasteManagement and Resource Mobilisation Centerrecently reached agreement with the local people todispose of the capital city’s waste at Sisdole for twoyears, by which time a long-term site is expected tobe ready at Okharpauwa.Sisdole Landfill Site for Kathmandu RefuseRandom and insanitary collection and disposalof urban solid waste in Nepal is the result of lack oflong-term perspective; deficiency in the planning,provision and operation of infrastructure; insufficientpublic lands that can be accessed for waste disposalpurposes; and absence of a holistic and integratedsystem for solid waste management. Solid wastemanagement is generally understood as sweepingthe street and dumping waste in places where itreceives no public opposition. Hence, waste iscommonly dumped on public land, forest,riverbanks, and other places ill-suited for thispurpose. Irregularity of collection is common, withheaps of garbage found piled up on the streets.NEFEJ108 Environment Assessment of Nepal : Emerging Issues and Challenges
Sanitary Landfill Site and Land-fillingLand-filling is a commonly used method for solid waste disposal. A landfill site is first selected considering presentuse and value of land; available area and potential life of landfill; the site’s soil and topography, geology, andhydrology; haulage distance; and settlements near the site. The selected site is developed into a proper landfill siteby providing drainage, access, and other structures and facilities necessary for a landfill operation. Operation involveslaying the waste in layers, compacting it, and covering it with earth at the end of each day’s operation. Many landfillsites around the world have been poorly engineered and operated, and hence face vociferous public opposition andcriticism for their adverse environmental impacts. The decomposition of the organic matter in a landfill site produceshighly polluting liquid, called leachate, and gases (mainly methane and carbon dioxide). Leachate can percolate down,causing groundwater pollution. Methane is a combustible gas and explosive when its concentration in air is between5% and 15%. Methane can accumulate below buildings or other enclosed spaces on or close to a landfill, posing riskof explosion. Other common concerns related to land-filling are odor; litter blown by the wind; scavenger birds, rodentsand insects attracted by the organic refuse; and dust and noise generated by the heavy trucks and equipment usedin transporting waste and operating the landfill.Because of the concerns arising from poor operation and management, siting and operation of landfill sites isa very sensitive public issue in Nepal. For a decade or so Kathmandu city has been facing a severe problem indisposing of its solid waste. In the early 1990s, people near the then-existing landfill site at Gokarna opposed thelandfill and obstructed its operation many times, resulting in waste accumulation on the streets of Kathmandu forseveral days, or inappropriate disposal of waste along the riverbanks. Later when the life of the Gokarna landfill sitewas finished, no other landfill site could be identified within the Valley due to public opposition, and Kathmandu’srefuse continued to be disposed of along the riverbanks. In 2005, authorities reached an agreement with local peopleto operate a short-term (2-year) landfill at Sisdol with a plan to prepare a long-term landfill site at Okharpauwa in thesame locality.Shortcomings in planning and design as well as poor operation and management are the primary causes ofpublic opposition to landfill sites. State-of-the art practice requires improvements in the way landfill sites are planned,designed, operated, and managed. A landfill site needs to have a buffer zone separating it from settlements and publicplaces, a liner should be placed at the bottom of the landfill site to control flow of the leachate to the groundwater,leachate should be collected and treated, and gases (particularly methane) need to be collected and either safelyvented or used as fuel, in addition to compaction and daily covering of the waste put in layers. Besides, waste maybe segregated into decomposable, reusable, recyclable, and the rest. Not all waste needs to be land-filled:decomposable waste can be converted into compost, and reusable and recyclable waste could be sold. Thedecomposable fraction of waste typically exceeds 60% in Nepal and is the one that produces leachate, gases, andattracts birds and insects. Separating this from the remaining waste not only reduces the volume to be land-filled(thus increasing the life of the landfill), but also reduces the chances of adverse environmental problems and publicopposition.Lalitpur MunicipalityOpen Dumping of Medical WasteSuch a state has many adverse environmentalconsequences. In the first place, it is aestheticallybad, causes bad smells, and is a nuisance to thepublic. Refuse also attracts animal scavengers andpests, can be a breeding place for disease-vectors,and can be hazardous to human health. Uncollectedrefuse gets into drains and blocks them, causingdisruption to drainage and sewerage systems.Irregular collection encourages people to burn wastewhich contains plastics and chemicals—the resultingemissions have long-term health implications. Therefuse also produces leachate that can contaminatesurface water and groundwater if not handledproperly. Haphazard solid waste collection is also asource of air pollution. Overall, unmanaged solidwaste not only causes significant adverse impacts onpublic health and the environment but alsodeterioration in the quality of life of people.Chapter 8: Urban Environment109
- Page 2 and 3:
About the OrganisationsAsian Develo
- Page 4 and 5:
© 2006 International Centre for In
- Page 6 and 7:
AcknowledgementsWe would like to ex
- Page 8 and 9:
PM2.5PAHRSSAARCSACEPSEASO 2TSPUKUND
- Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 6: Energy Resources 65Intro
- Page 12 and 13:
List of FiguresFigure 2.1: People a
- Page 14 and 15:
Table 6.1: Energy Consumption and P
- Page 16 and 17:
forests are also used for infrastru
- Page 18 and 19:
as data gathered by different agenc
- Page 20 and 21:
Table 2.1: Population Growth Rates
- Page 22 and 23:
mortality rates for rural and urban
- Page 24 and 25:
Agglomeration village in the centra
- Page 26 and 27:
soil erosion, and depletion of wate
- Page 30 and 31:
provision remains inadequate becaus
- Page 32 and 33:
Malnutrition remains a serious obst
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 2.24: Existing and Projected
- Page 36 and 37:
Table 2.28: Income Poverty Indicato
- Page 38 and 39:
Table 2.31: Change in Employment St
- Page 40 and 41:
In 2004, the average annual househo
- Page 42 and 43:
Mountain areas have the most food i
- Page 44 and 45:
Schaffner, U. 1987. “Road Constru
- Page 46 and 47:
Table 3.1: Agricultural Economic De
- Page 48 and 49:
Table 3.4: Estimated Soil Erosion R
- Page 50 and 51:
B. PradhanImpacts of land degradati
- Page 52 and 53:
Carson, B. 1985. “Erosion and Sed
- Page 54 and 55:
The trend of forest coverage in the
- Page 56 and 57:
BiodiversityState of BiodiversityNe
- Page 58 and 59:
The Government has given legal prot
- Page 60 and 61:
Different ways of maintaining biodi
- Page 62 and 63:
———.2004. State of the Enviro
- Page 64 and 65:
Appendix 4.1: Table continuedMajor
- Page 66 and 67:
Appendix 4.2: Protected Plant and W
- Page 68 and 69:
Table A4.2.3: Nepal's Share in Plan
- Page 70 and 71:
to intense weathering, and percolat
- Page 72 and 73: Table 5.5: Water Supply and Water T
- Page 74 and 75: Table 5.9: Water Quality of Shallow
- Page 76 and 77: species are reported to be endanger
- Page 78 and 79: Ministry of Water Resources (MOWR).
- Page 80 and 81: Definition, Forms, and UnitsEnergy
- Page 82 and 83: Table 6.5: Hydropower PotentialRive
- Page 84 and 85: Chilime Hydroelectric Project: An E
- Page 86 and 87: load occurs from 6 pm to 9 pm with
- Page 88 and 89: assessment of wind energy and lack
- Page 90 and 91: Review of Dams and Development by t
- Page 92 and 93: IUCNElizabeth Khaka, UNEP-NairobiRu
- Page 94 and 95: therefore reflect the three guiding
- Page 96 and 97: is a seasonal dust storm. Anthropog
- Page 98 and 99: Figure 7.3: Average Air Quality, Ja
- Page 100 and 101: matter, hydrocarbons, and NO x (Nae
- Page 102 and 103: Figure: 7.9: Vehicle Registered in
- Page 104 and 105: Brick Kilnchlorofluorocarbons (HCFC
- Page 106 and 107: Climate ChangeA region’s climate
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 7.14: Mean Annual Precipitat
- Page 110 and 111: Table 7.3: National Ambient Air Qua
- Page 112 and 113: India. Available: http://www.cleana
- Page 114 and 115: ———.1999. “Ambient Air Qual
- Page 116 and 117: Appendix 7.1: World Health Organiza
- Page 118 and 119: Table 8.1: Criteria for Urban Statu
- Page 120 and 121: accommodate the rapidly increasing
- Page 124 and 125: In most municipalities, hazardous w
- Page 126 and 127: in worsening public health conditio
- Page 128 and 129: objects of archaeological, historic
- Page 130 and 131: Min BajracharyaB. PradhanVehicles a
- Page 132 and 133: Department of Health Services (DOHS
- Page 134 and 135: Table 9.1 describes the major highl
- Page 136 and 137: the period to up 2017. The document
- Page 138 and 139: earthquakes; and awareness raising
- Page 140 and 141: Sub-regional LinkagesOther developi
- Page 142 and 143: Figure 9.1: The Key Environmental I
- Page 144 and 145: (iv)(v)(vi)plants, and other non-ti
- Page 146 and 147: environmental governance can be bet
- Page 148 and 149: can vary considerably. Both sides h
- Page 150 and 151: Dhungel, D.N., and A.B. Rajbhandari
- Page 152 and 153: Table A9.1.2: Industry-Specific Tol
- Page 154 and 155: . Cultural Heritage8. Convention fo
- Page 156 and 157: Appendix 9.3: Some Prominent Enviro
- Page 158 and 159: Some funding arrangements made by t
- Page 160 and 161: (NARDF 2004) for a period of 1 to 3
- Page 162 and 163: Table 10.2: Annual Income and Expen
- Page 164 and 165: Table 10.4: Users’ Share in Benef
- Page 166 and 167: From Hands Around Everest bookFrom
- Page 168 and 169: Table 10.8: Subsidy Rate for Biogas
- Page 170 and 171: microorganism communities and the n
- Page 172 and 173:
subsidies (Mason 1996). All these a
- Page 174 and 175:
addressed only part of the problem.
- Page 176 and 177:
historical practice of community-ma
- Page 178 and 179:
moved or relocated. The fact that s
- Page 180 and 181:
Kathmandu Valley and receives a lar
- Page 182 and 183:
cooperative ventures provided neith
- Page 184 and 185:
further poaching has not been repor
- Page 186 and 187:
http://www.pugwash.org/reports/pac/
- Page 188 and 189:
United Nations. 2003. World Populat
- Page 190 and 191:
how other countries with substantia
- Page 192 and 193:
(i) Broad-based and sustainable eco
- Page 194 and 195:
Although progress is encouraging, m
- Page 196 and 197:
Nepal’s Changing Pattern of Trade
- Page 198 and 199:
Table 12.2: Trade/ GDP RatiosFY1981
- Page 200 and 201:
Table 12.5: Percentage Share of Maj
- Page 202 and 203:
well as other provisions in specifi
- Page 204 and 205:
Future Implications for NepalIncrea
- Page 206 and 207:
International Trade Forum (ITN). 20
- Page 208 and 209:
- Gross domestic product per unit e
- Page 210 and 211:
Time Series InformationGenerally tw
- Page 212 and 213:
Table 13.1a: Different Datasets Col
- Page 214 and 215:
elevant due to its multidisciplinar
- Page 216 and 217:
Figure 13.6: Examples of Applicatio
- Page 218 and 219:
Judith DobmannThere are many source
- Page 220 and 221:
———.2003. Mapping Nepal Censu
- Page 222 and 223:
sustainable livelihoods requires an
- Page 224 and 225:
and haphazard. Population pressures
- Page 226 and 227:
issue. These deficiencies stem from
- Page 228 and 229:
population must be assessed. MOEST
- Page 230 and 231:
Appendix 14.1: List of Key Environm
- Page 232 and 233:
(vii) The EIA report approving agen
- Page 234 and 235:
Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty a
- Page 236 and 237:
Nepal’s Progress Towards the MDGs
- Page 238 and 239:
Goal 4: Reduce child mortalityReduc