Table 2.1: Population Growth Rates aCensus YearTotal PopulationAnnual NationalGrowth Rate (%)Rural Population% of total1952/1954 b 8,256,625 8,0<strong>18</strong>,350 97.11Annual RuralGrowth Rate (%)1961 9,412,996 1.7 9,076,774 96.43 1.21971 11,555,983 2.1 11,094,045 96.00 2.01981 15,022,839 2.6 14,066,1<strong>18</strong> 93.63 2.41991 <strong>18</strong>,491,097 2.1 16,795,378 90.83 1.82001 23,151,423 2.3 19,922,311 86.05 1.7 p2 log ep1a Growth rates of population are obtained from the following equation: r tb Census of 1952/54 cover ed two Nepali yea rs, approximately mid <strong>April</strong> 1952 to mid <strong>April</strong> 1954Source: CBS (2003) pp. 37–85.Table 2.2: Distribution, Density, and Growth of Rural Population by RegionRegionRural Area(km²)Rural Population Change1991–20011991 2001%IncreaseGrowthRate% of TotalPopulation1991% of TotalPopulation2001RuralDensityper km 22001Mountain 51,661 1,405,113 1,644,154 17.0 1.6 8.7 8.3 32Hill 59,955 7,289,308 8,567,672 17.5 1.6 45.0 43.0 143Terai 32,289 8,100,957 9,710,485 19.9 2.6 46.3 48.7 301Country 143,905 16,795,378 19,922,311 <strong>18</strong>.6 1.7 90.8 86.1 138km 2 = square kilometerSource: CBS (2003) pp. 37–85.the rural population have increased enormously. In1952, the country’s total population was 8.26 million,with a rural population of 8 million that increased to20 million by 2001 (Table 2.1). However, thecountry’s annual population growth rates havealways exceeded the annual rural population growthrates (Table 2.1; Fig. 2.2). It is estimated that thepopulation will reach 29 million by 2011 (CBS 2003).Since 1981, national and rural populationgrowth rates have been rapid, putting tremendouspressure on natural resources such as agriculturalland and forests. At present, the population density ofthe country as a whole is 157 persons per squarekilometer (km 2 ). The density on agricultural land is570 persons per km 2 .Owing to variations in topography, naturalresources, cultures, and infrastructure facilities, theMountain, Hill, and Terai regions exhibit markedvariations in the growth and distribution of ruralpopulation (Table 2.2). The rural populationincreased in all three regions between 1991 and2001, but the growth of rural population in Mountainand Hill areas (17%), was less than in the Terai (29%).The growth rate of rural population in the Terai was2.6% per year, higher than the growth rate in the twoother regions. In both the Mountain and the Hillregions, the growth rate of rural population was lessthan the growth rate of the national rural population(2.1%).According to the 2001 census, the Terai—whichhas the smallest area—has the largest share of ruralpopulation with 49%, followed by the Hill (43%) andthe Mountain regions (8%). Comparing the relativeshare of rural population in the regions between thecensus years 1991 and 2001, the Mountain and Hillregions have shown a decreasing trend and the Teraian increasing trend. As a result, the density of ruralFigure 2.2: National, Rural, and Urban PopulationGrowth Rates, NepalSource: CBS (2003)6 Environment Assessment of Nepal : Emerging Issues and Challenges
population in the Terai with 301 persons per km 2 isthe highest in the country.With the lowest density and growth rate ofpopulation, the Mountain region has less pressure onits natural resources than the other two regions. Forexample, the per capita cultivated landholding in theMountain region is 0.31 hectares (ha) compared with0.16 and 0.17 ha in the Hill and the Terai regions,respectively (Table 2.3). Likewise, the Terai regionhas the lowest per capita forest land (0.11 ha), whilethe Mountain region has the largest per capita forestland. In other words, the Terai has the greatestpressure on both its cultivated and forest resources.Economic CharacteristicsThe economically active population above 10 yearsof age constitutes 45% of the nation as a whole. Ofthe total rural population, 48% are economicallyactive, compared with 41% in urban areas. In allcases, however, the proportions of economicallyactive population are below 50%, which means thatthere is a large dependent population.According to the 2001 census, 66% of the totalgainfully employed population is engaged in theprimary sector including agriculture, forestry, andfishery. This figure was 81% in 1991. There was asignificant increase in employment in themanufacturing (secondary) and commerce (tertiary)sectors between 1991 and 2001. In rural areas, theprimary sector employed 72% of the total gainfullyemployed population as against 42% in urban areas.About 10% and 17% of the rural gainfully employedpopulation are engaged in the secondary and tertiarysectors, as against <strong>18</strong>% and 40% in urban areas. Theshare of the primary sector in the Mountain region is81%, compared with 68% and 60% in the Hill andTerai regions, respectively. Other importantemployment sectors in the Hill and Terai regions arecommerce, manufacturing, and personal andcommunity services.Social CharacteristicsIn the last census in 2001, the literacy rate of thecountry’s total rural population 6 years of age andabove (16,428,<strong>18</strong>3) was 52% (Table 2.4), comparedwith the national literacy rate of 54% (CBS 2002b).The rural literacy rate is higher in the Hill region(58%) than in the Terai (48%) or the Mountains (48%).The rural sex ratio is 99.8 males per 100 females.The Terai region as a whole has a ratio of 103.8,whereas the Mountain and the Hill regions haveratios of 98.4 and 95.8, respectively. The sex ratio islowest in the western development region at 93.The dependent population below 15 and above59 years of age accounts for 53% of the total ruralpopulation. The total fertility rate among womenaged 15–49 years is 4.4, which is double the rate ofurban women (2.1); the under-five mortality rate inrural areas is 112 per thousand live births vs. 66 inurban areas; contraceptive prevalence in rural areasis 47% among women of reproductive age (15–49)compared with 66% for urban areas; and infantTable 2.3: Cultivated and Forest Land by Region, Nepal, 2001RegionTotal Area(km²)Number ofDistrictsPer Capita Cultivated Land(ha) aPer Capita Forest Land(ha) aMountain 51,817 16 0.31 0.70Hill 61,345 39 0.16 0.30Terai 34,019 20 0.17 0.11Country 147,<strong>18</strong>1 75 0.<strong>18</strong> 0.24ha = hectare; km 2 = square kilometeraNo separate data on cultivated land and forest land available at rural level .Source: JAFTA (2001)Table 2.4: Literacy Status of the Rural Population (6 years of age and above) aLiteracy CategoryMountain Hill Terai Rural TotalNumber % Number % Number % Number %Can’t read or write 625,<strong>18</strong>4 51.0 2,965,111 41.9 4,139,386 51.0 7,729,681 47.1Read only 82,876 6.8 487,617 6.9 487,632 6.0 1,058,125 6.4Read and write 507,6<strong>18</strong> 41.4 3,588,820 50.7 3,441,026 42.4 7,537,464 45.9Not stated 10,277 0.8 40,215 0.5 52,421 0.6 102,913 0.6Total 1,225,955 100.0 7,081,763 100.0 8,120,465 100.0 16,428,<strong>18</strong>3 100.0a Rural literacy for a district is obtained by subtracting the urban literate population from the total literate population.Source: CBS (2002b)Chapter 2: Rural Environment, Poverty, and Livelihood7
- Page 2 and 3: About the OrganisationsAsian Develo
- Page 4 and 5: © 2006 International Centre for In
- Page 6 and 7: AcknowledgementsWe would like to ex
- Page 8 and 9: PM2.5PAHRSSAARCSACEPSEASO 2TSPUKUND
- Page 10 and 11: Chapter 6: Energy Resources 65Intro
- Page 12 and 13: List of FiguresFigure 2.1: People a
- Page 14 and 15: Table 6.1: Energy Consumption and P
- Page 16 and 17: forests are also used for infrastru
- Page 18 and 19: as data gathered by different agenc
- Page 22 and 23: mortality rates for rural and urban
- Page 24 and 25: Agglomeration village in the centra
- Page 26 and 27: soil erosion, and depletion of wate
- Page 30 and 31: provision remains inadequate becaus
- Page 32 and 33: Malnutrition remains a serious obst
- Page 34 and 35: Table 2.24: Existing and Projected
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2.28: Income Poverty Indicato
- Page 38 and 39: Table 2.31: Change in Employment St
- Page 40 and 41: In 2004, the average annual househo
- Page 42 and 43: Mountain areas have the most food i
- Page 44 and 45: Schaffner, U. 1987. “Road Constru
- Page 46 and 47: Table 3.1: Agricultural Economic De
- Page 48 and 49: Table 3.4: Estimated Soil Erosion R
- Page 50 and 51: B. PradhanImpacts of land degradati
- Page 52 and 53: Carson, B. 1985. “Erosion and Sed
- Page 54 and 55: The trend of forest coverage in the
- Page 56 and 57: BiodiversityState of BiodiversityNe
- Page 58 and 59: The Government has given legal prot
- Page 60 and 61: Different ways of maintaining biodi
- Page 62 and 63: ———.2004. State of the Enviro
- Page 64 and 65: Appendix 4.1: Table continuedMajor
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 4.2: Protected Plant and W
- Page 68 and 69: Table A4.2.3: Nepal's Share in Plan
- Page 70 and 71:
to intense weathering, and percolat
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 5.5: Water Supply and Water T
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 5.9: Water Quality of Shallow
- Page 76 and 77:
species are reported to be endanger
- Page 78 and 79:
Ministry of Water Resources (MOWR).
- Page 80 and 81:
Definition, Forms, and UnitsEnergy
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 6.5: Hydropower PotentialRive
- Page 84 and 85:
Chilime Hydroelectric Project: An E
- Page 86 and 87:
load occurs from 6 pm to 9 pm with
- Page 88 and 89:
assessment of wind energy and lack
- Page 90 and 91:
Review of Dams and Development by t
- Page 92 and 93:
IUCNElizabeth Khaka, UNEP-NairobiRu
- Page 94 and 95:
therefore reflect the three guiding
- Page 96 and 97:
is a seasonal dust storm. Anthropog
- Page 98 and 99:
Figure 7.3: Average Air Quality, Ja
- Page 100 and 101:
matter, hydrocarbons, and NO x (Nae
- Page 102 and 103:
Figure: 7.9: Vehicle Registered in
- Page 104 and 105:
Brick Kilnchlorofluorocarbons (HCFC
- Page 106 and 107:
Climate ChangeA region’s climate
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure 7.14: Mean Annual Precipitat
- Page 110 and 111:
Table 7.3: National Ambient Air Qua
- Page 112 and 113:
India. Available: http://www.cleana
- Page 114 and 115:
———.1999. “Ambient Air Qual
- Page 116 and 117:
Appendix 7.1: World Health Organiza
- Page 118 and 119:
Table 8.1: Criteria for Urban Statu
- Page 120 and 121:
accommodate the rapidly increasing
- Page 122 and 123:
managing solid waste. They are part
- Page 124 and 125:
In most municipalities, hazardous w
- Page 126 and 127:
in worsening public health conditio
- Page 128 and 129:
objects of archaeological, historic
- Page 130 and 131:
Min BajracharyaB. PradhanVehicles a
- Page 132 and 133:
Department of Health Services (DOHS
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 9.1 describes the major highl
- Page 136 and 137:
the period to up 2017. The document
- Page 138 and 139:
earthquakes; and awareness raising
- Page 140 and 141:
Sub-regional LinkagesOther developi
- Page 142 and 143:
Figure 9.1: The Key Environmental I
- Page 144 and 145:
(iv)(v)(vi)plants, and other non-ti
- Page 146 and 147:
environmental governance can be bet
- Page 148 and 149:
can vary considerably. Both sides h
- Page 150 and 151:
Dhungel, D.N., and A.B. Rajbhandari
- Page 152 and 153:
Table A9.1.2: Industry-Specific Tol
- Page 154 and 155:
. Cultural Heritage8. Convention fo
- Page 156 and 157:
Appendix 9.3: Some Prominent Enviro
- Page 158 and 159:
Some funding arrangements made by t
- Page 160 and 161:
(NARDF 2004) for a period of 1 to 3
- Page 162 and 163:
Table 10.2: Annual Income and Expen
- Page 164 and 165:
Table 10.4: Users’ Share in Benef
- Page 166 and 167:
From Hands Around Everest bookFrom
- Page 168 and 169:
Table 10.8: Subsidy Rate for Biogas
- Page 170 and 171:
microorganism communities and the n
- Page 172 and 173:
subsidies (Mason 1996). All these a
- Page 174 and 175:
addressed only part of the problem.
- Page 176 and 177:
historical practice of community-ma
- Page 178 and 179:
moved or relocated. The fact that s
- Page 180 and 181:
Kathmandu Valley and receives a lar
- Page 182 and 183:
cooperative ventures provided neith
- Page 184 and 185:
further poaching has not been repor
- Page 186 and 187:
http://www.pugwash.org/reports/pac/
- Page 188 and 189:
United Nations. 2003. World Populat
- Page 190 and 191:
how other countries with substantia
- Page 192 and 193:
(i) Broad-based and sustainable eco
- Page 194 and 195:
Although progress is encouraging, m
- Page 196 and 197:
Nepal’s Changing Pattern of Trade
- Page 198 and 199:
Table 12.2: Trade/ GDP RatiosFY1981
- Page 200 and 201:
Table 12.5: Percentage Share of Maj
- Page 202 and 203:
well as other provisions in specifi
- Page 204 and 205:
Future Implications for NepalIncrea
- Page 206 and 207:
International Trade Forum (ITN). 20
- Page 208 and 209:
- Gross domestic product per unit e
- Page 210 and 211:
Time Series InformationGenerally tw
- Page 212 and 213:
Table 13.1a: Different Datasets Col
- Page 214 and 215:
elevant due to its multidisciplinar
- Page 216 and 217:
Figure 13.6: Examples of Applicatio
- Page 218 and 219:
Judith DobmannThere are many source
- Page 220 and 221:
———.2003. Mapping Nepal Censu
- Page 222 and 223:
sustainable livelihoods requires an
- Page 224 and 225:
and haphazard. Population pressures
- Page 226 and 227:
issue. These deficiencies stem from
- Page 228 and 229:
population must be assessed. MOEST
- Page 230 and 231:
Appendix 14.1: List of Key Environm
- Page 232 and 233:
(vii) The EIA report approving agen
- Page 234 and 235:
Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty a
- Page 236 and 237:
Nepal’s Progress Towards the MDGs
- Page 238 and 239:
Goal 4: Reduce child mortalityReduc