12.07.2015 Views

ADB_book_18 April.qxp - Himalayan Document Centre - icimod

ADB_book_18 April.qxp - Himalayan Document Centre - icimod

ADB_book_18 April.qxp - Himalayan Document Centre - icimod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and haphazard. Population pressures are stretchinglimited infrastructure and services beyond theircapacity. Visible signs include sprawling urbansettlements, congestion, poor or nonexistent sanitaryfacilities, unmanaged dumping of solid andhazardous waste, and degraded and polluted urbanair and water. The most serious adverse effectsattributed to the deteriorated urban environment arerelated to health. Unplanned and haphazardurbanization also encroaches on open spaces,agricultural and marginal lands, and heritage sites.The emergence of urban slums and urban poverty inNepal’s cities is a relatively new phenomenon andstill minor when compared with the problem facedby major cities in South Asia.The Guided Land Development and LandPooling Acts are two government initiatives to planand guide urbanization in some municipalities.These are aimed at facilitating the adjustment of landplots so that space is provided for urbaninfrastructure—roads, water supply, drainage,electricity, and telephone. Provision for urbaninfrastructure in Nepal has been largely driven bycentral sectoral institutions such as the Nepal WaterSupply Cooperation, the Department of Roads, theSolid Waste Management and Resource MobilizationCenter, the Nepal Telecommunications Corporation,and the Nepal Electricity Authority. Recently, after theenactment of the Local Self-Governance Act 1999,municipalities are being increasingly empowered tomanage their urban areas. However, in spite of goodintentions, the municipalities generally lack thecapacity and resources to do so. The TownDevelopment Fund was established in 1997 toprovide financial resources, loans, and technicalassistance to local bodies to help them implementtown infrastructure projects. However, the lack ofcoordination and mutual support among theinstitutions remain the main stumbling block in theplanning, construction, and maintenance of urbaninfrastructure and facilities. Institutional confusionregarding the assignment of responsibility, authority,and handling of resources remains contentious.The Kathmandu Urban Development Projectthat began in 1993 was the first Asian DevelopmentBank (<strong>ADB</strong>)–financed urban sector project in Nepal.An operations evaluation mission evaluated it in 2003(<strong>ADB</strong> 2003) and reached several conclusions:(i) The project was adequately designed from atechnical perspective, but public participationwas not sufficient to ensuresustainability.(ii) The land pooling scheme devised in theproject has become a model for other landpooling schemes. An integrated environmentalmanagement system that couldcomprise water supply, groundwaterrecharge, rainwater harvesting, wastewaterrecycling, and wastewater treatment couldalso be implemented.(iii) Population in the project area exceeded theprojection, resulting in overuse of infrastructureor its inadequacy. Infrastructure waspoorly maintained. Maintenance requiresadequate financing (one source of whichcould be property tax) and institutionalcapacity (training and capacity building ofstaff, and so on).(iv) Community networking and training shouldcontinue beyond initial project implementation.Nongovernment organizations (NGOs)can play a crucial role in building awarenessof proper operation and maintenance.Since completing the Kathmandu UrbanDevelopment Project, the <strong>ADB</strong> has financed severalother projects related to the urban sector. Theseinclude the Melamchi Water Supply Project ($120million), Small Towns Water Supply and SanitationSector ($35 million), Kathmandu Valley Water ServicesSector Development Program ($10 million), andUrban and Environment Improvement ($30 million).Other donors have also provided support for urbaninfrastructure and services. For example, GermanTechnical Cooperation (GTZ) supported solid wastemanagement in Kathmandu, and urban developmentthrough local efforts in several municipalities; UnitedNations Development Programme (UNDP) and theWorld Bank supported the Metropolitan EnvironmentImprovement Programme; Danish InternationalDevelopment Agency (DANIDA) supported theEnvironment Sector Programme Support; and theEuropean Union supported the Kathmandu ValleyMapping Programme.Important lessons regarding urban environmentalmanagement in Nepal can be derived bothfrom donor-supported programs and from the smallscaleenvironmental activities of NGOs. These twosectors have been involved in converting waste intoresources (through composting, making briquettesfrom waste, paper recycling, management of solidwastes by communities, and others), in promotingalternative approaches to waste/sewage treatment,and in addressing the needs of the urban poor(including slums and squatters’ quarters). Integratedenvironmental planning and management can alsobenefit from the process of integrated actionplanning 2 tried in some municipalities.2Integrated action planning is based on people’s participation. Ward level community meetings are the cornerstone of this approach. Other features are mobilisationand participation of the community in the identification, prioritisation, and programing of municipal development activities and making the planning process more peopleoriented.210 Environment Assessment of Nepal : Emerging Issues and Challenges

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!