In 2004, the average annual household income(average household size 5.3) was NRs 80,111,yielding an average annual per capita income of NRs15,162 (NLSS 2004). The average per capita incomein urban areas was NRs 32,573, compared with NRs12,124 in rural areas; it was higher in the Hills (NRs<strong>18</strong>,299) than in the Terai (NRs 12,975) and theMountains (NRs 12,295).Landholding Distribution and LandFragmentationLandholding distribution and land fragmentation canbe related to population growth and distribution.Rapid population growth has increased pressure onagricultural land, resulting in encroachment ofmarginal lands on fragile hill slopes. This has seriousenvironmental repercussions.Data on area and fragmentation of landholdingshave been derived from the National Census ofAgriculture (CBS 2004), the most recent sourceavailable. These data on cultivated area are based onnational census households; however, they do notmatch the data derived from mapping sources suchas satellite imagery, aerial photographs, andtoposheets (which have been used for computingland use categories of the country). According to theagriculture census (CBS 2004), the averagelandholding size for the country in 2001/02 was 0.79ha, down from 0.95 ha in 1991/92. The pressure ofpopulation on cultivated land has increasedconsiderably. This pressure is even more severe inHill areas, where the average landholding size is now0.66 ha (Table 2.37). Households in rural areas havean average agricultural landholding of 0.8 hacompared with 0.5 ha for urban areas.Average landholdings have decreased, mainlyas a result of a decrease in the number of parcelsheld by a family (CBS 2004 and Table 2.37). Theaverage parcel size and total number of parcels haschanged little over the years. Both the averageholding size and the average parcel size are largest inthe Terai. The average parcel size is smallest, and thenumber of parcels per holding largest in mountainareas, reflecting the fragmented nature of thelandscape.The distribution of cultivated land is highlyskewed. The 2001/02 agriculture census shows that25% of the total landholdings account for over 61% ofthe total cultivated land (CBS 2004a). Although theaverage landholding size was 0.79 ha, nearly 75% offarm holdings were smaller than 0.5 hectare, andaccounted for only 39% of all cultivated land. TheNLSS shows that 45% of farmers cultivate less than0.5 ha of land and 8% of farmers cultivate 2 ha ormore. Small farmers (less than 0.5ha) cultivate only13% of all agricultural land as compared with 31%cultivated by large farmers.Production PatternThe country’s cereal crops are paddy, maize, wheat,millet, and barley. Major cash crops includesugarcane, oilseed, and potato. The area underdifferent crops is shown in Table 2.38. The croppedarea is greater than the cultivated area becausesome areas carry two or even three different crops ina year. Paddy is the principal crop in terms ofcropped area, accounting for 45% of the totalcropped area of the selected crops in the country.Young Women Preparing a Field for Winter VegetableCrops in Kathmandu ValleyB. PradhanTable 2.37: Area and Fragmentation of LandholdingsDescriptionMountain Hill Terai Country1991/92 2001/02 1991/92 2001/02 1991/92 2001/02 1991/92 2001/02Number of landholdings ('000) 260.7 298.2 1357.7 1,586.4 1117.6 1,479.5 2,736.1 3,364.1Total area of holdings ('000ha) 176.9 2<strong>18</strong>.7 1047.3 1,038.6 1374.8 1,396.7 2,598.9 2,654.0Average holding size (ha) 0.68 0.73 0.77 0.66 1.23 0.94 0.95 0.79Number of parcels ('000) 1207.0 5317.7 4282.0 10,806.2 10,987.0Average parcels per holding 4.6 3.9 3.9 4.0 3.3Average parcel size (ha) 0.15 0.21 0.32 0.23 0.24ha = hectareSource: CBS (2004) p. 112.26 Environment Assessment of Nepal : Emerging Issues and Challenges
Maize and wheat are the second and third mostimportant crops in terms of cropped area. Thesethree cereal crops have different positions in thedifferent regions. In terms of cropped area, paddy isthe most important crop in the Terai (61%); andmaize the most important crop in the Hills (38%) andMountains (29%). Likewise, paddy is the secondmost important crop in the Hills and wheat in theMountains and Terai.Among the cash crops, the Terai has the largestcropped area of oilseeds, and Hill areas the largestcropped area of potato. Sugarcane has the nextlargest cropped area in the Terai, and oilseed in theHills. Cropping intensity, measured by the totalcropped area divided by the total cultivated area, isgreater in the Terai (1.23) than in the Hills (1.11) orMountains (0.72).Figure 2.4 shows the trends in cultivated area ofcereal and cash crops from 1996 to 2002. The area ofmajor cereal crops changed marginally from 2,942thousand ha in 1996 to 3,030 thousand ha in 2000 andto 3,010 thousand ha in 2002 (CBS 2004). Thecultivated area of the three major cash cropsoilseeds, potato, and sugarcane increasedconsistently from 1996 to 2002.Despite increased production of crops, thecountry is in food deficit by 41,198 tons (Table 2.39).The Agricultural Perspective Plan estimated that 41out of 75 districts were food deficient, with thesituation in the Mountains in terms of total foodrequirement the worst. The livelihood groupsidentified as food deficient are marginal farmers(with landholdings less than 0.5 ha) in all regions;rural service providers; agricultural laborers; potters;and urban squatters. The calorie supply for Nepal is2448 kilocalories/person/day (FAO 2004). NLSSindicates that 31% of Nepalese households have lessthan adequate food consumption, and 67% justadequate (CBS 2004a). Food inadequacy is muchhigher in rural areas (34%) than in urban areas (17%).Table 2.38: Cultivated Area of Selected Crops by Region (ha)CropMountain Hill Terai Totalha % ha % ha % ha %Paddy 40,430 20.4 396,820 28.2 1,030,000 61.3 1,467,250 44.69Wheat 42,100 21.3 239,980 17.1 289,<strong>18</strong>0 17.2 571,260 17.40Maize 57,700 29.2 535,800 38.1 160,590 9.6 754,090 22.97Millet 25,120 12.7 138,500 9.9 13,020 0.8 176,640 5.38Barley 10,910 5.5 15,410 1.1 3,340 0.2 29,660 0.90Sugarcane 100 0.1 2,360 0.2 34,950 2.1 37,410 1.14Oilseeds 1,840 0.9 28,790 2.0 123,940 7.4 154,570 4.71Potato 19,550 9.9 47,130 3.4 <strong>18</strong>,900 1.1 85,580 2.61Cropped Area 197,750 100.0 1,404,920 100.0 1,680,310 100.0 3,282,980 100.00Cultivated Area 275,948 1,267,961 1,367,864 2,911,773Cropping Intensity 0.72 1.11 1.23 1.13ha = hectareSource: CBS (2001) pp. 86–175.Figure 2.4: Trends in Cultivated Area of Selected Crops,Nepal (1996-2002)Table 2.39: Fo od Production and Requirement (tons )Region Food Supply Food Required Food BalanceMountain 152,162 277,315 (125,153)Hill 932,331 1,112,563 (<strong>18</strong>0,202)Terai 1,843,793 1,579,636 264,157Country 2,928,286 2,969,514 (41,198)Source: CBS (2002a)Source: CBS (2004)Chapter 2: Rural Environment, Poverty, and Livelihood27
- Page 2 and 3: About the OrganisationsAsian Develo
- Page 4 and 5: © 2006 International Centre for In
- Page 6 and 7: AcknowledgementsWe would like to ex
- Page 8 and 9: PM2.5PAHRSSAARCSACEPSEASO 2TSPUKUND
- Page 10 and 11: Chapter 6: Energy Resources 65Intro
- Page 12 and 13: List of FiguresFigure 2.1: People a
- Page 14 and 15: Table 6.1: Energy Consumption and P
- Page 16 and 17: forests are also used for infrastru
- Page 18 and 19: as data gathered by different agenc
- Page 20 and 21: Table 2.1: Population Growth Rates
- Page 22 and 23: mortality rates for rural and urban
- Page 24 and 25: Agglomeration village in the centra
- Page 26 and 27: soil erosion, and depletion of wate
- Page 30 and 31: provision remains inadequate becaus
- Page 32 and 33: Malnutrition remains a serious obst
- Page 34 and 35: Table 2.24: Existing and Projected
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2.28: Income Poverty Indicato
- Page 38 and 39: Table 2.31: Change in Employment St
- Page 42 and 43: Mountain areas have the most food i
- Page 44 and 45: Schaffner, U. 1987. “Road Constru
- Page 46 and 47: Table 3.1: Agricultural Economic De
- Page 48 and 49: Table 3.4: Estimated Soil Erosion R
- Page 50 and 51: B. PradhanImpacts of land degradati
- Page 52 and 53: Carson, B. 1985. “Erosion and Sed
- Page 54 and 55: The trend of forest coverage in the
- Page 56 and 57: BiodiversityState of BiodiversityNe
- Page 58 and 59: The Government has given legal prot
- Page 60 and 61: Different ways of maintaining biodi
- Page 62 and 63: ———.2004. State of the Enviro
- Page 64 and 65: Appendix 4.1: Table continuedMajor
- Page 66 and 67: Appendix 4.2: Protected Plant and W
- Page 68 and 69: Table A4.2.3: Nepal's Share in Plan
- Page 70 and 71: to intense weathering, and percolat
- Page 72 and 73: Table 5.5: Water Supply and Water T
- Page 74 and 75: Table 5.9: Water Quality of Shallow
- Page 76 and 77: species are reported to be endanger
- Page 78 and 79: Ministry of Water Resources (MOWR).
- Page 80 and 81: Definition, Forms, and UnitsEnergy
- Page 82 and 83: Table 6.5: Hydropower PotentialRive
- Page 84 and 85: Chilime Hydroelectric Project: An E
- Page 86 and 87: load occurs from 6 pm to 9 pm with
- Page 88 and 89: assessment of wind energy and lack
- Page 90 and 91:
Review of Dams and Development by t
- Page 92 and 93:
IUCNElizabeth Khaka, UNEP-NairobiRu
- Page 94 and 95:
therefore reflect the three guiding
- Page 96 and 97:
is a seasonal dust storm. Anthropog
- Page 98 and 99:
Figure 7.3: Average Air Quality, Ja
- Page 100 and 101:
matter, hydrocarbons, and NO x (Nae
- Page 102 and 103:
Figure: 7.9: Vehicle Registered in
- Page 104 and 105:
Brick Kilnchlorofluorocarbons (HCFC
- Page 106 and 107:
Climate ChangeA region’s climate
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure 7.14: Mean Annual Precipitat
- Page 110 and 111:
Table 7.3: National Ambient Air Qua
- Page 112 and 113:
India. Available: http://www.cleana
- Page 114 and 115:
———.1999. “Ambient Air Qual
- Page 116 and 117:
Appendix 7.1: World Health Organiza
- Page 118 and 119:
Table 8.1: Criteria for Urban Statu
- Page 120 and 121:
accommodate the rapidly increasing
- Page 122 and 123:
managing solid waste. They are part
- Page 124 and 125:
In most municipalities, hazardous w
- Page 126 and 127:
in worsening public health conditio
- Page 128 and 129:
objects of archaeological, historic
- Page 130 and 131:
Min BajracharyaB. PradhanVehicles a
- Page 132 and 133:
Department of Health Services (DOHS
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 9.1 describes the major highl
- Page 136 and 137:
the period to up 2017. The document
- Page 138 and 139:
earthquakes; and awareness raising
- Page 140 and 141:
Sub-regional LinkagesOther developi
- Page 142 and 143:
Figure 9.1: The Key Environmental I
- Page 144 and 145:
(iv)(v)(vi)plants, and other non-ti
- Page 146 and 147:
environmental governance can be bet
- Page 148 and 149:
can vary considerably. Both sides h
- Page 150 and 151:
Dhungel, D.N., and A.B. Rajbhandari
- Page 152 and 153:
Table A9.1.2: Industry-Specific Tol
- Page 154 and 155:
. Cultural Heritage8. Convention fo
- Page 156 and 157:
Appendix 9.3: Some Prominent Enviro
- Page 158 and 159:
Some funding arrangements made by t
- Page 160 and 161:
(NARDF 2004) for a period of 1 to 3
- Page 162 and 163:
Table 10.2: Annual Income and Expen
- Page 164 and 165:
Table 10.4: Users’ Share in Benef
- Page 166 and 167:
From Hands Around Everest bookFrom
- Page 168 and 169:
Table 10.8: Subsidy Rate for Biogas
- Page 170 and 171:
microorganism communities and the n
- Page 172 and 173:
subsidies (Mason 1996). All these a
- Page 174 and 175:
addressed only part of the problem.
- Page 176 and 177:
historical practice of community-ma
- Page 178 and 179:
moved or relocated. The fact that s
- Page 180 and 181:
Kathmandu Valley and receives a lar
- Page 182 and 183:
cooperative ventures provided neith
- Page 184 and 185:
further poaching has not been repor
- Page 186 and 187:
http://www.pugwash.org/reports/pac/
- Page 188 and 189:
United Nations. 2003. World Populat
- Page 190 and 191:
how other countries with substantia
- Page 192 and 193:
(i) Broad-based and sustainable eco
- Page 194 and 195:
Although progress is encouraging, m
- Page 196 and 197:
Nepal’s Changing Pattern of Trade
- Page 198 and 199:
Table 12.2: Trade/ GDP RatiosFY1981
- Page 200 and 201:
Table 12.5: Percentage Share of Maj
- Page 202 and 203:
well as other provisions in specifi
- Page 204 and 205:
Future Implications for NepalIncrea
- Page 206 and 207:
International Trade Forum (ITN). 20
- Page 208 and 209:
- Gross domestic product per unit e
- Page 210 and 211:
Time Series InformationGenerally tw
- Page 212 and 213:
Table 13.1a: Different Datasets Col
- Page 214 and 215:
elevant due to its multidisciplinar
- Page 216 and 217:
Figure 13.6: Examples of Applicatio
- Page 218 and 219:
Judith DobmannThere are many source
- Page 220 and 221:
———.2003. Mapping Nepal Censu
- Page 222 and 223:
sustainable livelihoods requires an
- Page 224 and 225:
and haphazard. Population pressures
- Page 226 and 227:
issue. These deficiencies stem from
- Page 228 and 229:
population must be assessed. MOEST
- Page 230 and 231:
Appendix 14.1: List of Key Environm
- Page 232 and 233:
(vii) The EIA report approving agen
- Page 234 and 235:
Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty a
- Page 236 and 237:
Nepal’s Progress Towards the MDGs
- Page 238 and 239:
Goal 4: Reduce child mortalityReduc