12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction: The courts have recently become increasingly involved in the administration <strong>of</strong>compulsory psychiatric services in Israel. Data reveals a gradual increase in the rate <strong>of</strong> courtordered hospitalizations according to Section 15 <strong>of</strong> the Law for the Treatment <strong>of</strong> the Mentally Ill.This trend bears significant implications, particularly relating to the issues <strong>of</strong> security and safetyin psychiatric hospitalization.Aim: The presentation will present highlights from extensive British experience, focusing on thepotential implications on forensic psychiatry in Israel.Methods: The development <strong>of</strong> the hierarchy <strong>of</strong> security in the British psychiatric services isreviewed, beginning in the early 1970s with the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Butler Committee thatdetermined a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> three levels <strong>of</strong> security for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients, culminating withthe establishment <strong>of</strong> principles for the operation <strong>of</strong> medium security units (Read Committee,1991). These developments were the basis for the forensic psychiatric services in Britain.Subsequently current experience and dilemmas in the process <strong>of</strong> planning the first mediumsecurity ward in Israel will be discussed.Conclusions: A safe and suitable environment is a necessary condition for a treatment setting.The establishment <strong>of</strong> separate medium security units or forensic psychiatry departments within amental health facility will enable the concentration and classification <strong>of</strong> court-orderedadmissions and will enable systemic flexibility and capacity for better treatment, commensuratewith patient needs as well as optimizing the risks relating to this population.Long-Term Outcomes <strong>of</strong> Patients with Schizophrenia Detained in a ScottishHigh Security HospitalRajan Darjee, The Orchard Clinic, Edinburgh, UK (Rajan.Darjee@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk)Introduction: People with schizophrenia who commit serious violence are detained in securehospitals. The research presented here investigated the long-term outcomes <strong>of</strong> patients withschizophrenia detained in a high security hospital.Method: The sample was 169 patients with schizophrenia resident at the State Hospital,Carstairs, between August 1992 and August 1993. In 1992-4 patients and their psychiatrists wereinterviewed and data were collected from case records. Patients were followed up until the end <strong>of</strong>2001. Records covering the intervening period were examined, and patients and independentinformants were interviewed in 2000 and 2001. A number <strong>of</strong> structured instruments were used atinterviews and to interrogate case records.Results: Most patients were male, unmarried and from socially disadvantaged backgrounds.Most had been admitted from criminal courts after committing serious <strong>of</strong>fences, half weresubject to restriction orders and a quarter had killed. Most had had psychiatric treatmentpreviously. Comorbid substance dependence and personality disorder were common. Threequarterscommitted at least one act <strong>of</strong> violence, but less than a quarter caused serious harm.There were almost 2000 violent incidents, mostly in high security. Violence in the communitywas rare. A third had episodic symptoms, a quarter continuous symptoms and a fifth recovery120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!