12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

attorneys working with experts and equally for experts working with attorneys is preparation. Itis essential for attorneys working with experts. It makes no difference if the expert is yours ortheirs. Preparation is the key. For experts, without adequate preparation, advocacy for theiropinions would be inadequate. But before this key can be used, there are issues that must beaddressed: what does your client want? What is the theory <strong>of</strong> your case? What type <strong>of</strong> expert doyou need? Where will you find the expert? What does the expert need to do to work successfullywith the attorney? Once those questions are answered, there is more to consider.Junk Science Case Of Serotonin Syndrome In CourtSteven Fayer, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA (Stevenfayer@gmail.com)A medical malpractice case involving allegations <strong>of</strong> improper prescribing as the cause <strong>of</strong> deathdue to seratonin syndrome, was shown to be a false accusation. The case went to a trial and thispresentation will describe the case as an example <strong>of</strong> junk science. I will define junk science andalso discuss the Daubert ruling as a means <strong>of</strong> maintaining the standard for the proper inclusion <strong>of</strong>scientific principles in the legal system. This case and the jury verdict will be discussed.181. Women and Families in Adverse Life SituationsEggshells in the NestDebra Bastien, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New Brunswick (dbastien@unb.ca)Combat-induced PTSD has historically generated psychological casualties <strong>of</strong> war and has beenan ongoing concern for Canadian Forces (CF) personnel, their wives and families. There hasbeen extensive media coverage on the escalating number <strong>of</strong> PTSD diagnoses since deploymentsto Afghanistan, however little attention has been given to CF families at risk for “secondarytraumatisation” (Hoge, 2010). 70.8% <strong>of</strong> military personnel are married and 54% <strong>of</strong> these familieshave children, the majority <strong>of</strong> which are under the age <strong>of</strong> 11 (Triscott & Dupres, 1996). Violenceand instability create upheaval amongst families dealing with PTSD (Harrison & Laliberte,1994). Croatian authors, Franciskovic et al. (2007) recommend that treatments <strong>of</strong>fered toveterans with PTSD must also be <strong>of</strong>fered to their families. Veterans with PTSD return from warexpecting home to provide safety and security, yet stress can intensify when they have difficultyreintegrating into spousal and parental responsibilities. Spouses are generally unprepared for theunpredictable and violent reactions that may emerge when traumatic memories are triggered. Allmembers <strong>of</strong> the family walk on eggshells in navigating this unknown high risk terrain. To date,few studies have addressed this complicated family dilemma. In this narrative inquiry the silentand secret stories <strong>of</strong> the trauma and healing <strong>of</strong> military wives are examined. Narrative <strong>of</strong>fers ameans <strong>of</strong> giving voice to personal experiences. Uncovering the private realm <strong>of</strong> these intimatestories can provide health care workers and policy makers with a deeper understanding <strong>of</strong> how426

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!