12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

performing forensic evaluations in the context <strong>of</strong> civil litigation after a youth's suicide in whichbullying may have played a role. This presentation will examine some <strong>of</strong> the challengesassociated with post hoc suicide forensic evaluations where bullying is cited as a "causative"factor.20. Capacity and IncapacityA Therapeutic Approach to Assessing Competence and Capacity in the Context<strong>of</strong> Testamentary, Enduring Power <strong>of</strong> Attorney and Advance Care DirectiveDocuments in AustraliaKelly Purser, Queensland <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Technology (k.purser@qut.edu.au)Jeanne Madison, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New England (jmadison@une.edu.au)Eilis Magner, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New England (emagner@une.edu.au)Australia lacks a satisfactory, national paradigm for assessing competence and capacity in thecontext <strong>of</strong> testamentary, enduring power <strong>of</strong> attorney and advance care directive documents.Competence/capacity assessments are currently conducted on an ad hoc basis by legal and/ormedical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. The reliability <strong>of</strong> the assessment process is subject to the skill set andmutual understanding <strong>of</strong> the legal and/or medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional conducting the assessment. Thereis a growth in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> diseases such as dementia. Such diseases impact upon cognitionwhich increasingly necessitates collaboration between the legal and medical pr<strong>of</strong>essions whenassessing the effect <strong>of</strong> mentally disabling conditions upon competency/capacity.Miscommunication and lack <strong>of</strong> understanding between legal and medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals involvedcould impede the development <strong>of</strong> a satisfactory paradigm. A qualitative study seeking the views<strong>of</strong> legal and medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who practise in this area has been conducted. Thisincorporated surveys and interviews <strong>of</strong> 10 legal and 20 medical practitioners. Some <strong>of</strong> the resultsare discussed here. Practitioners were asked whether there is a standard approach and whethernational guidelines were desirable. There was general agreement that uniform guidelines for theassessment <strong>of</strong> competence/capacity would be desirable. The interviews also canvassed views asto the state <strong>of</strong> the relationship between the pr<strong>of</strong>essions. The results <strong>of</strong> the empirical researchsupport the hypothesis that relations between the pr<strong>of</strong>essions could be improved. Thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> a national paradigm would promote consistency and transparency <strong>of</strong> process,helping to improve the pr<strong>of</strong>essional relationship and maximising the principles <strong>of</strong> autonomy,participation and dignity.Addressing a Lack <strong>of</strong> Mental Capacity: Courts Authorising the Making <strong>of</strong> Willsfor Living but Incapacitated Persons in AustraliaFiona Burns, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sydney (fiona.burns@sydney.edu.au)54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!