12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

assume that these differences were determined, at least in part, by key distinctions between earlyCeltic and Native American models, but in fact, modern British and American approaches reflectin both instances a deliberately eclectic blending <strong>of</strong> strategies and techniques unlimited bygeographical or cultural boundaries. In each case, the true source <strong>of</strong> discernible methods fordealing with elder abuse from a Restorative Justice perspective can be found in relatively recentlegislative and policy developments that reflect, for example, the influence <strong>of</strong> codified Americansentencing guidelines and the comparative independence <strong>of</strong> the British judiciary when it comesto fixing penalties for criminal transgressions. This presentation will underscore salientdifferences with reference to case law, statutes, regulations, ethical codes, and sociolegalresearch. Participants will be encouraged to consider how the most humane, effective, andheuristic innovations can be adopted and applied from one system to another in enhancingRestorative Justice approaches to elder abuse.145. Rights, Risk <strong>of</strong> Harm, & Decision Making Capacity:<strong>International</strong> Responses to Involuntary Psychiatric Treatmentin Light <strong>of</strong> the CPRDRising to the Human Rights Challenge: Capacity-Based Treatment Arrives inAustralian LawSascha Callaghan, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New South Wales (sascha.callaghan@sydney.edu.au)Christopher Ryan, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sydney (christopher.ryan@sydney.edu.au)Australian mental health law is on the verge <strong>of</strong> a major change. Legislative reviews in severalstates under the influence <strong>of</strong> the Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> Persons with Disabilities have seenthe introduction <strong>of</strong> some important human rights based innovations. For example Mental HealthBills in Tasmania and Victoria will only permit treatment without consent where patients lackcapacity to make their own treatment decisions. However, problems still remain in the retention<strong>of</strong> risk-<strong>of</strong>-harm criteria which may unfairly restrict access to health services for people withmental illness. This session will give an overview <strong>of</strong> key rights based developments in Australianmental health law and discuss the remaining challenges in ensuring true equal treatment forperson with mental illness in line with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the CPRD.Compulsion in Mental Health Treatment: Is Capacity Really the Way Forward?Peter Bartlett, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Nottingham (peter.bartlett@nottingham.ac.uk)The tendency among progressive mental health policy advocates in the last years has been tomove towards a system where capacity serves as the gateway <strong>of</strong> compulsion. This paper345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!