12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

graduate from a MHC have a reintegrative shaming experience that affirms they are not definedby their deviant behaviors, they are respected, and they have been forgiven and welcomed backinto the community; thus, they gain or renew confidence in themselves which reduces thelikelihood that they will commit a crime.Considering Mental Health Courts and the Spectrum <strong>of</strong> Mentally DisorderedOffendersWilliam H. Fisher, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, Lowell & <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts MedicalCenter (bill.fisher@umassmed.edu)Empirical research has found that not all mentally disordered <strong>of</strong>fenders are arrested for the sametype <strong>of</strong> crimes or have the same influences in their <strong>of</strong>fending behaviors. This paper willcategorize mentally disordered <strong>of</strong>fenders into coherent groups useful for multiple analyticpurposes. It will discuss how individuals in each <strong>of</strong> these groups may be affected by mentalhealth courts and, in particular, by the program components and processes described in thepapers presented in this session.30. Compulsory Community CareIs Compulsory Mental Health Treatment Compatible with Mental HealthRecovery?Allison Alexander, Edinburgh Napier <strong>University</strong> (a.alexander@napier.ac.uk)The existence <strong>of</strong> laws allowing compulsory detention and treatment has been questioned bymany for a range <strong>of</strong> reasons (see Eastman and Peay 1999). More recently in an article for theScottish Recovery Network, Mary O’Hagan (2012) has described compulsory legal powers as‘the elephant in the recovery room’. Those who write about mental health recovery (e.g. Repperand Perkins 2003) emphasise the importance <strong>of</strong> mental health service users feeling in control <strong>of</strong>their own lives. In contrast, a lack <strong>of</strong> control is <strong>of</strong>ten experienced by people within the mentalhealth system especially if placed there against their will. This presentation will examine whethermodern mental health law with an emphasis on liberal social welfare principles and rights iscompatible with a recovery focused mental health system. With reference to the Mental Health(Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act the presenter will <strong>of</strong>fer an analysis <strong>of</strong> whether the Scottishapproach to compulsory detention and treatment and the Scottish policy objective <strong>of</strong> recoveryfocused practice are fundamentally incompatible.77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!