12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

investigations into preventable deaths in Residential Aged Care facilities have a similar process.These summaries draw together the key clinical practice and standards issues for a given periodand highlight areas for ongoing quality improvement action. Some <strong>of</strong> these findings that haveresulted in education and practice review are presented.57. Emerging Practices in Prison and Jail Re-Entry: Managing Riskand Promoting Treatment EngagementEngagement Processes in Model Programs for Prison Re-Entry for Offenderswith Serious Mental IllnessBeth Angell, Rutgers <strong>University</strong> (angell@ssw.rutgers.edu)Stacey Barrenger, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania (slbarrenger@gmail.com)Amy Watson, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Illinois, Chicago (acwatson@gmail.com)Jeffrey Draine, Temple <strong>University</strong> (jeffdraine@gmail.com)Linking <strong>of</strong>fenders with mental illness to treatment following prison release is critical topreventing recidivism, but little research exists to inform efforts to engage them effectively. Thispresentation compares the engagement process in two model programs, each representing anevidence-based practice for mental health which has been adapted to the context <strong>of</strong> prison reentry.One model, Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT), emphasizes a long-termwrap-around approach that seeks to maximize continuity <strong>of</strong> care by concentrating all serviceswithin one interdisciplinary team; the other, Critical Time Intervention (CTI), is a time-limitedintervention that promotes linkages to outside services and bolsters natural support systems. Tocompare engagement practices, we analyze data from two qualitative studies, each conducted ina newly developed treatment program serving prisoners with mental illness being dischargedfrom prisons to urban communities. Findings show that both programs rely upon the provision <strong>of</strong>concrete, tangible resources as a key method <strong>of</strong> engaging <strong>of</strong>fenders, and each program providesintensive emotional support during the reentry transition. Nevertheless, FACT and CTI embodydistinct cultures and rituals <strong>of</strong> reentry, exhibited in their approaches to pre-release engagement,the transition out <strong>of</strong> prison, and the encouragement <strong>of</strong> mental health care seeking post release.Examination <strong>of</strong> the Risk Environment on Community Re-Entry from Prison forMen with Mental IllnessStacey Barrenger, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania (slbarrenger@gmail.com)Jeffrey Draine, Temple <strong>University</strong> (jetpak@temple.edu)Beth Angell, Rutgers <strong>University</strong> (angell@ssw.rutgers.edu)142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!