12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152. Self and Other: Conceptual and Empirical Aspects <strong>of</strong> Identityand DifferenceOtto Rank, the Brothers Grimm, and Snow White’s Queen: PsychologicalDistortions in Seeing Ourselves and OthersOlivette R. Burton, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania (burtoethics@yahoo.com)‘“Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who in this land is fairest <strong>of</strong> all?” And the mirror always said:“You, my queen, are fairest <strong>of</strong> all”’. And thus the Queen in Snow White begins her day by beingreassured, by some hazy figure, that she is somehow different, better and more special thanothers. Discrimination begins with self-delusion. This can and has been quickly followed bycognitive dissonance and the inability to tolerate difference. This chain contributes significantlyto produce the “isms” with which our society continues to struggle. This presentation is about theothers; those that society perceives as being different and possibly threatening and the reasonswhy. People who look different, act different and possibly think differently irrespective <strong>of</strong>whether that difference is religious, cultural, or racial. Is the inability to tolerate the other’sdifference a product <strong>of</strong> personality? Does it emanate from personal defects <strong>of</strong> egodevelopment, or from issues <strong>of</strong> paranoia or lack <strong>of</strong> object constancy? Or rather is it trainingproduced by the environment, lack <strong>of</strong> resources, or biochemical factors? This presentation willdiscuss how narcissistic distortion on both the societal and individual level consciously andunconsciously creates significant psychic pain and suffering.Patient Responsibilities in a Psychotherapeutic AllianceDuff R. Waring, York <strong>University</strong> (dwaring@yorku.ca)Patients in a psychotherapeutic alliance should act responsibly in their progression towardrestoration <strong>of</strong> self. I will concentrate on the ethical virtues that patients should cultivate in thisprogression. The patient in this alliance is a “normative project” for both the therapist and him orherself. I focus on self-regarding ethical responsibilities. I elucidate them as virtue ethicalaspirations to develop and strengthen one’s capacity for better responding to the demands <strong>of</strong> theworld, i.e. commitments to aspire to self-improvement. This requires cultivation <strong>of</strong> a contextspecificpr<strong>of</strong>ile virtue <strong>of</strong> self-regarding care. This idea was foreshadowed by Hellenistic ethicsand invites a reformulated contemporary expression. To that end, I will show how this virtuediffers from Kantian duties to the self (Kant 1985) and from Foucault’s notion <strong>of</strong> “care <strong>of</strong> theself” (Foucault 1994, 2001). I relate it to Swanton’s pr<strong>of</strong>ile virtues <strong>of</strong> self-respect and self-love(Swanton 2003). It subsumes more specific patient virtues, e.g., persistence, courage, honesty,hopefulness, and flexibility (Radden and Sadler 2010, 137). Psychotherapy can enable patients torespond to the ethical challenge <strong>of</strong> leading a critically good life. Meeting this challenge connectswith moral respect for others (cf. Dworkin 2011).361

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!