12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ethical decision-making with regard to the set-up and implementation <strong>of</strong> relevant researchprojects.Psychobiological Studies on Risky Adolescent Substance Use: Ethical AspectsAnja C. Huizink, VU <strong>University</strong> (a.c.huizink@vu.nl)To gain insight into which psychobiological factors have an impact on the development <strong>of</strong> riskysubstance use among youth, including early onset <strong>of</strong> smoking, drinking and cannabis use, manyresearchers conduct longitudinal studies. In such a research design, it is possible to examine in atemporal manner if certain psychobiological factors (e.g. stress sensitivity) are associated withrisky substance use. However, direct effects <strong>of</strong> acute exposure to stress on increase in substanceuse, frequently found in adult populations, cannot be assessed in a younger population. This isdue to ethical guidelines, which imply that a researcher cannot actively expose an adolescent tosubstance use, by making, for instance, alcoholic beverages available to them when they areunder-aged. Nonetheless, several lines <strong>of</strong> research suggest that particularly adolescents may bevulnerable to stress effects. Adolescents’ brains are highly sensitive to reward, and thissensitivity may be further increased under stressful situations. With several examples <strong>of</strong>important fundamental research questions, and their possible implications, I will describe theusefulness and limitations <strong>of</strong> ethical guidelines for research among youthWhat Researchers Want (and Medical-Ethical Committees Loathe):Dilemmas in Examining Gene-Environment Interactions in Children’sAntisocial BehaviorGeertjan Overbeek, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Utrecht (g.overbeek@uu.nl)Suppose you are a psychologist who gets a grant to conduct an experiment on gene-environmentinteractions that underlie children’s antisocial behavior. Unfortunately, despite your new andrelevant research ideas it takes you a year and four resubmissions before you win acceptancefrom your medical-ethical committee. How is this possible? Building from my own experienceand gained insight, this presentation identifies some <strong>of</strong> the major ethical dilemmas in conductinga randomized trial that involves collecting data on children’s genetic make-up. The dilemmasconcern 1. the (un)desirability <strong>of</strong> giving participants information about their genetic make-up, 2.the (un)desirability <strong>of</strong> including a control group in an experiment <strong>of</strong> a known effectiveintervention, and 3. the fundamental necessity – or lack there<strong>of</strong> – <strong>of</strong> collecting genetic data inboth children and their parents. Based on a critical review <strong>of</strong> medical-ethical review procedures,I conclude that several fundamental flaws now limit their efficiency and relevance. A moresystematic check <strong>of</strong> ethical difficulties in grant proposal reviews and the construction <strong>of</strong> an(inter)national database <strong>of</strong> previous ethical decisions and justifications can help to overcomethese current flaws.270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!