12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Renewing and Prolonging Sentences: Dutch Variations on South African Two-Stage SentencingMarijke Drost, Sub Rosa Psychiatric Expertise, Utrecht, Netherlands (deweertdrostm@ziggo.nl)Similarities and differences between Section 286A <strong>of</strong> the South African Criminal Procedure Act(two-stage sentencing) and the Dutch law for mentally ill <strong>of</strong>fenders (adults and minors) will bediscussed. The TBS-system for adults and the PIJ-measure for children and adolescents aged 12-23 share the dual purpose <strong>of</strong> protecting society and treatment/rehabilitation for the mentally ill<strong>of</strong>fender or disturbed child. If the risk <strong>of</strong> serious re<strong>of</strong>fending remains unchanged, the TBSmeasurecan last for life, sometimes in a special longstay unit without the perspective <strong>of</strong>rehabilitation. The TBS-measure for adults will be regularly evaluated by a judge, even in alongstay situation. Assessment by an independent psychologist and psychiatrist will be done atthese occasions. The PIJ-measure will expire at the age <strong>of</strong> 23, without re-assessment <strong>of</strong> theoriginal sentence. Some politicians have proposed to increase the maximum sentence for 16-and17-year-olds, and to make it possible to convert the PIJ-measure into a TBS-measure for adults.A child could thus remain in the system for a very long time. These proposals have met withmuch criticism.Section 76(3) <strong>of</strong> the Child Justice Act 2008: A Disguised Route to Prison or anIncentive for a Child to Improve and be Able to Benefit through an EarlyRelease?Annette van der Merwe, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pretoria (Annette.vandermerwe@up.ac.za)The Child Justice Act 2008 (s 76(3)) introduced a new type <strong>of</strong> sentence applicable to child<strong>of</strong>fenders who commit serious crimes in South Africa, and which, if committed by an adult,would have justified a term <strong>of</strong> imprisonment exceeding 10 years. In such cases, the court may, ifsubstantial and compelling circumstances exist, in addition to a child and youth care sentence (s76(1)&(2)), sentence the child to a period <strong>of</strong> imprisonment to be served after completion <strong>of</strong> thetime at the child and youth care centre (CYCC). The child will, however, first appear before thechild justice court for reconsideration <strong>of</strong> the sentence <strong>of</strong> imprisonment in the light <strong>of</strong> a reportprepared by the head <strong>of</strong> the CYCC. This paper examines the following aspects: the history <strong>of</strong> andrationale for this section, the requirements for its application, the required report and the extentto which the CYCCs can make this sentence work well for young people if they can encouragethe young person to behave well during his or her time at the CYCC. Foreign jurisdictions, suchas Canada and England, are also briefly evaluated for comparison in this regard.404

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!