12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This paper concerns a study in which we investigated the treatment effects on the behavior <strong>of</strong>violent forensic psychiatric patients during their stay in hospital. For that purpose, 237 inpatientswere measured between 2003 and 2011 bi-annually by the staff on the ward with the aid <strong>of</strong> theObservation Scale for Aggressive Behavior (OSAB). As a start, we compared the patients’subscale scores during the successive bi-annual measurements. During a period <strong>of</strong> five years,scores on the Irritation/Anger, Anxiety/Gloominess, Antecedents, and Aggression subscales werefound to increase, then decrease, then again increase and finally again decrease. Scores on theProsocial Behavior subscale increased gradually over the course <strong>of</strong> time. A significant relationbetween PCL-R scores and aggressive behavior on the ward was found only during the first twoyears <strong>of</strong> stay. We concluded that a structured and controlled environment has a strong influenceon the behavior <strong>of</strong> violent <strong>of</strong>fenders. Consequently, the relevance <strong>of</strong> risk assessment in a closedsetting is discussed.The Use <strong>of</strong> the Implicit Association Test in Differentiating between CognitionsRelated to Reactive and Proactive AggressionAlmar J. Zwets, FPC de Kijvelanden, Rotterdam, Netherlands (almarzwets@hotmail.com)This paper concerns a study in which we investigated whether certain cognitions shoulddifferentiate between <strong>of</strong>fenders and students, and between reactively and proactively aggressivepatients. By using an Implicit Association Task (IAT) we analyzed cognitions in a group <strong>of</strong>violent forensic psychiatric inpatients and a group <strong>of</strong> students. We used two IAT's: a violent IAT(pleasant, unpleasant, peace, and violence) and a control IAT (pleasant, unpleasant, flowers, andinsects). IAT-scores were compared between both groups. We expected that the inpatients wouldhave a less negative association to violence than the students. Scores <strong>of</strong> reactively aggressivepatients were compared with those <strong>of</strong> proactively aggressive patients. From the literature, weexpected that patients who show proactive aggression have a less negative association toviolence on the IAT. Other factors which might have influenced these results, like psychopathy,were taken into account. During our presentation the results <strong>of</strong> our study will be presented.Consequences <strong>of</strong> our results for the development <strong>of</strong> an effective treatment program will bediscussed.79. Innovation in Mental Health Shared Decision Making Policy,Practice, and ResearchWhat Helps and Hinders Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Services?Miles Rinaldi, South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK(Miles.Rinaldi@slwstg-tr.nhs.uk)191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!