Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

destructive behaviour, mental health, bad peers) and family characteristics (family structure,employment status of the parents, mental health of the parents, destructive behaviour, criminalantecedents, domestic violence). When focusing on the juvenile court records of minors withmental disorders, significantly more information was found on school problems (suspension,truancy), functioning of the minor (aggression, running away from the institution, destructivebehaviour) and the received mental health care than in the records of minors without a mentaldisorder.Conclusion: The information in the court records varies. More specifically, the information in thecourt records of minors with and without a mental disorder differs on several factors. This affectsthe decision making of the juvenile judge, which is partly based on court records. Based uponour findings, we recommend minimum standards of what ought to be included in a record tooptimize the court files.The Decision-Making Process of Belgian Juvenile Judges Concerning Minorswith Mental DisordersLeen Cappon, Ghent University (leen.cappon@ugent.be)Purpose: Over the years, numerous studies have examined the factors that influence thedecisions of juvenile judges. These factors can be organized in an analytical frameworkconsisting of four categories (legal factors, characteristics of the minors, structural context andsocial context). Despite high prevalence rates of mental disorders in minors in juvenile court,decision-making research has rarely focused on this subgroup of the juvenile court population.Therefore, this paper aims to gain insight into the decisions of juvenile judges concerning minorswith mental disorders.Method: The judgments of 104 juvenile court records of minors with mental disorders (n=792),from two juvenile courts in Belgium, were analyzed based on the four categories of the analyticalframework. The analysis was executed in Nvivo 9.Results: The majority of juvenile judges in their judgments concerning minors with mentaldisorders referred to legal factors and to the information present in the juvenile court record(structural context). Remarkably, almost no references to the mental health problems of theminors were found in their judgments.Conclusion: This paper concludes that the judgments more frequently referred to so-called legalfactors than to factors related to the minor with mental disorders. These results urge furtherresearch on the decision of the juvenile judge concerning this subgroup.Placement Moves in the Care of Minors with and without Mental Disorders inJuvenile CourtSofie Merlevede, Ghent University (sofie.merlevede@ugent.be)382