12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In many areas, the juvenile justice system has been a safety net for community mental health.Practitioners <strong>of</strong> juvenile justice <strong>of</strong>ten report that youth in their care are demonstratingsignificantly more mental health symptoms than in past decades. The question is, are these youthpenetrating deep-end juvenile justice programs because they are mentally ill or is it because theyare delinquent? This presentation will explore the differences between mentally disordered youthand non-mentally ill youth who have been committed to long-term secure placements. Using chisquareand logistic regression techniques, this study will examine the differences in regards tooverall composite risk, antisocial attitudes, peers, and family. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> theseanalyses, policy and practice implications will be explored.A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Juvenile Drug Court Effective for Youth with Co-Occurring orSubstance Use Only DisordersCarrie Sullivan, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati (carrie.sullivan@uc.edu)Paula Smith, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati (paula.smith@ uc.edu)Christopher Sullivan, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati (sullivc6@ucmail.uc.edu)Leslie Blair, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati (leslie.blair@hotmail.com)Edward J. Latessa, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati (edward.latessa@uc.edu)Studies <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> juvenile drug courts have yielded mixed findings. A study <strong>of</strong>juvenile drug courts, funded by the Office <strong>of</strong> Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, wasrecently completed in the United States. The study combined evaluations <strong>of</strong> the processes usedby nine juvenile drug courts with outcome evaluations <strong>of</strong> their respective effectiveness inreducing recidivism and/or the improvement <strong>of</strong> other important outcome measures. While theseresults generally advance our understanding <strong>of</strong> how varying drug court practices impact theeffectiveness <strong>of</strong> juvenile drug courts, this paper will present differences in findings betweenyouth with co-occurring disorders and youth with only substance use disorders to determine ifyouth with co-occurring disorders can be well served in drug courts. The possible implicationsfor drug courts and mental health courts will be explored.Separate but Equal? Understanding the Impact <strong>of</strong> Gender ResponsiveTreatment in Correctional SettingsLori Brusman-Lovins, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati (brusmala@ucmail.uc.edu)There is much debate in corrections about the best method for treating and managing female<strong>of</strong>fenders. Generalists argue that there is limited empirical evidence that the method for reducingrecidivism differs for males and females. Those in the gender specific camp argue that thepathway to criminality differs for females, thus treatment for female <strong>of</strong>fenders should vary from138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!