12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

egards the second question, further questions need to be addressed, such as: Could Europeanand Swiss law schools adopt the existing MSL and TJ curricula or at least some pertinentcourses <strong>of</strong> other law schools? If so, how could or indeed should the teaching <strong>of</strong> MSL and TJ beadapted to the specific characteristics and needs <strong>of</strong> European, and more specifically, <strong>of</strong> Swisslegal (further) education? Should MSL and TJ be taught together or separately? What would bethe pros and cons? Could MSL and TJ also be integrated into the teaching <strong>of</strong> other disciplines,such as legal psychology, legal pedagogy, and legal theory? If so how? What would be the prosand cons? In tackling these questions, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to foster the introduction <strong>of</strong>MSL and TJ as legal disciplines to be taught not only in European universities but also in furtherlegal education, law firms, state agencies, courts, and so forth.202. Therapeutic or Anti-Therapeutic? Health Care Policy Choicesin the United StatesPhysician-Patient Communication … Now Against the law?Monica Broome, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Miami (mbroome@med.miami.edu)In January 2010, Florida House Bill 155 was filed to prohibit licensed practitioners from askingand or documenting whether a person owns a gun. The bill also prohibits licensed practitionersfrom dismissing a patient who refuses to answer questions about gun ownership. Breaking thislaw would be a 3 rd degree felony, with punishment up to five years jail time and a five milliondollar fine, no exceptions. This presentation will provide a brief history <strong>of</strong> House Bill 155, thesubsequent amendments, and current standing. It will then engage participants in a livelydiscussion <strong>of</strong> the legal and medical issues regarding interference in the practitioner-patientrelationship related, but not limited, to the following questions:How is this law possible, and how did its passage happen?What are the stakes?What about concerns for safety?Are we interfering in a relationship that has always been seen as exempt from such interference?Do we need to limit physician autonomy?Is patient privacy being protected with this law?Are we protecting patients from discrimination?The Therapeutic Value <strong>of</strong> Mandated Reporting <strong>of</strong> Poor Diabetes Control: theCase <strong>of</strong> the New York City Department <strong>of</strong> Health’s A1C RegistryAlina M. Perez, Nova Southeastern <strong>University</strong> (amp@nova.edu)485

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!