12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

others argue staff shortage leads to more seclusion. Studies show flexible personnel, unfamiliarto the ward and team, may induce aggression in wards. Personnel planning depends primarily onthe distribution <strong>of</strong> financial means. It remains unclear to what extent personnel planning isrelated to the severity <strong>of</strong> the patient population at the ward. Methods and materials: In anationwide benchmark study into coercion, information into personnel planning was gathered.Of all admitted patients data on diagnosis, global assessment <strong>of</strong> functioning, age, sex and ethnicbackground were gathered. Diagnosis was transformed into a severity index. These data wereincluded in a single database and univariate and multi level analyses were performed. Results:Seclusion rates at ward level varied from less than 1 up to 157 hours per bed hour. Wards withlower rates contained more patients with anxiety and mood disorders, and as well as a higherGAF (mean=47). Wards with higher seclusion rates contained more patients with bipolardisorders and schizophrenia and a lower GAF (mean=40). The number <strong>of</strong> nurses varied littlebetween wards with high and low rates despite a clear difference in patient severity. Personnelplanning seemed not related to patient severity. Conclusions: This study showed that structuraladjustment <strong>of</strong> personnel deployment to patient severity may possibly prevent seclusion. Thisimplies that organisations need to develop instruments for monitoring patient severity as well ascare intensity allowing the adjustment <strong>of</strong> personnel deployment. Criteria have to be set,warranting one to one or one to two nursing support.Associations between Short Term Structured Risk Assessment Outcomes andSeclusionR. van de Sande, (Roland.vandesande@hu.nl)E.O. NoorthoornA.I. Wierdsma,E.M. Hellendoorn,C. van der Staak,C.L. Mulder.H.L.I. NijmanBackground: Seclusion as a routine intervention to manage dangerous behavior is still in use atmany acute psychiatric wards around the world. Apart from the therapeutic value <strong>of</strong> thisintervention, the objectivity <strong>of</strong> clinical decisions on whether to seclude or not, may bequestioned. Research findings indicate that symptoms and behavior <strong>of</strong> acutely admitted patientsfluctuate drastically within hours and that structured daily risk assessment canreduce the risk <strong>of</strong> aggressive incidents and duration <strong>of</strong> seclusion. Goal: The aim was to study theassociations between scores on two, daily administered structured observation tools (BrøsetViolence Checklist and the Kennedy Axis V) and seclusion. Methods: Patient characteristicswere gathered from hospitals databases. Nurses daily scored two scales on self-control andglobal patient functioning, using the Brøset Violence Checklist and the Kennedy Axis V. Datawere analysed using multi-level techniques. Results: In this study, 7403 risk assessments (BVC's338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!