12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

observers (ins<strong>of</strong>ar as such emotional detachment is possible) in inheritance disputes, or whetherthey are straying beyond their legal remit in passing ‘judgement’ on the perceived rights andwrongs <strong>of</strong> the situation.The Impact <strong>of</strong> Neurodiversity and Emotionality on Clinical and LegalJudgements <strong>of</strong> Decision-Making CapacityRobin MacKenzie, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kent (r.mackenzie@kent.ac.uk)Medical decision-making by patients is respected as a lawful exercise <strong>of</strong> free will and agencyunless patients are found to lack “competence”. Yet, clinical measures <strong>of</strong> competence in medicaldecision-making typically assess only cognitive abilities. Emotionality is involved in decisionmakingand may affect how far patients’ decisions to accept or refuse medical treatment embodyfree will. Moreover, neurodivergence, or atypical neurological makeup, is <strong>of</strong>ten diagnosed asneurodegeneration, neurodysfunction, neural damage or neural difference and frequently leads todifficulties in considering the emotional aspects <strong>of</strong> decisions that standard tests do not measureor divulge. Neurodiversity activists assert that their neural differences are not pathologies to betreated or cured but are alternative ways <strong>of</strong> being which should be accepted as neuroequal.Nevertheless, who may claim to be neurodiverse is uncertain. I focus on atypical emotionality toconsider the limits <strong>of</strong> neurodiversity in relation to clinical and legal assessments <strong>of</strong> decisionmakingcapacity, particularly in relation to diagnoses <strong>of</strong> mental illness.94. Law and Representations <strong>of</strong> Social PathologiesTrauma in Kafka’s The Trial and Real Life Legal ExperiencesJoan I. Schwarz, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin at Whitewater (schwarzj@uww.edu)While the legal system in Kafka’s The Trial is <strong>of</strong>ten described as referring to no specific legalsystem, the system he portrays mirrors the inquisitorial system <strong>of</strong> law akin to German andAustrian criminal proceeding <strong>of</strong> the time. Kafka intentionally distorts anonymous bureaucratsinteracting with characters that lack a clear sense <strong>of</strong> direction; are unable to see beyondimmediate events; and do not discern any possibility <strong>of</strong> escape. His description <strong>of</strong> an inquisitorialsystem <strong>of</strong> law produces in the reader feelings <strong>of</strong> hopelessness, fear and trauma, and alienationand persecution, all with a sense <strong>of</strong> impending disaster. Kafka has written in his letters that “thebooks we need are the kind that act upon us as a misfortune, that make us suffer at the death <strong>of</strong>someone we love more than ourselves, that make us feel like we are on the verge <strong>of</strong> suicide, orare lost in a forest remote from all human habitation – a book shall serve as an axe for the frozensea within us.” He further asserts that “we ought to read the books that wound and stab us. Weneed the books that affect us like a disaster, that grieve us deeply.” Hence, “Kafkaesque” is a229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!