12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prosecuting Sexual Assault: The Pre-Arrest Screening Process and itsImplicationCassia Spohn, Arizona State <strong>University</strong> (cassia.spohn@asu.edu)Research on prosecutorial decisions in sexual assault cases focuses on the post-arrest chargingdecision. This reflects an assumption on the part <strong>of</strong> researchers that law enforcement will arrest asuspect if they have probable cause to do so and that they then will present the case to theprosecutor for a formal charging decision. Research on sexual assault case processing decisionsin Los Angeles revealed that prosecutors play a role in screening cases prior to the arrest <strong>of</strong> thesuspect. In this jurisdiction, law enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials who have probable cause to make an arrest<strong>of</strong>ten present the case to the district attorney and, if the district attorney determines that the casedoes not meet the standard <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> beyond a reasonable doubt, they then clear the case byexceptional means. In this paper, I present data on the prevalence <strong>of</strong> pre-arrest screening and Idiscuss the explanations given by detectives and district attorneys for this practice. I also identifythe predictors <strong>of</strong> prosecutors’ pre- and post-arrest filing decisions and discuss the implications <strong>of</strong>the pre-arrest screening process and the overuse <strong>of</strong> the exceptional clearance.155. Sexual Assault and ViolenceSex, Power, and Sexism in Sexual AggressionEmily Blake, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kent (eab28@kent.ac.uk)Several studies have found an automatic power-sex association in sexually aggressive men (e.g.,Bargh, Raymond, Pryor & Strack, 1995). This lends support to theorists who propose that a needfor dominance and power are motivating factors for harmful sexual behaviour. Furthermore,evidence <strong>of</strong> such an automatic link provides evidence that non-concious processes may play arole in the <strong>of</strong>fence process. However, in a study designed to assess the strength <strong>of</strong> an automaticlink between power and sex in rape prone men, we instead found a relationship in the oppositedirection. This link was related to high levels <strong>of</strong> endorsement <strong>of</strong> rape supportive beliefs andsexual dominance. This indicates that men who report sexual dominance, and who endorse highlevels <strong>of</strong> rape supportive beliefs tend to associate weakness with sex, rather than power with sex.We propose that this unusual finding may represent an interaction between sexism, rapesupportive beliefs, and sexual dominance. We hypothesise that the stimuli in our study designedto represent weakness as a concept may be interpreted by some males as a representation <strong>of</strong>traditional gender roles, or attributes sexually dominant men look for in a partner. Thesehypotheses are explored in terms <strong>of</strong> feminist theories <strong>of</strong> rape and more contemporary sociocognitivetheories. Finally, results are discussed with references to further research as well astreatment implications.365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!