12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ight combination <strong>of</strong> services and sanctions, in the right place at the right time. Key reformpackage elements include: Diversion: The expansion <strong>of</strong> civil citation and other innovativediversion practices will stem the flow <strong>of</strong> first-time misdemeanant youth into the system.Historically, Florida has spent millions <strong>of</strong> dollars on interventions for low-risk youth who wouldprobably never re-<strong>of</strong>fend. Detention Reform: Statewide detention reform, including thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> real alternatives to detention, will fuel continued reductions in unnecessary andinappropriate detention. Reduced detention over the past several years has allowed DJJ to closehundreds <strong>of</strong> beds, yielding a cost-savings <strong>of</strong> more than $25 million. Right-Sizing ResidentialCare: The past several years have also revealed significant inefficiencies at the deep-end <strong>of</strong>Florida’s juvenile justice system, with far too many low-risk youth confined in expensiveresidential institutions. They consume scarce resources that could instead be invested incommunity-based sanctions that hold youth accountable, protect public safety, create jobs andpromote healthy futures for children. Community-based sanctions are more effective at reducingjuvenile crime and cost much less than correctional institutions.82. Intellectual DisabilitiesResearch on Freedom Restrictions: Quality GuidelinesVivianne Dorenberg, VU <strong>University</strong> - Medical Centre & Free <strong>University</strong> - Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law(v.dorenberg@vumc.nl)In recent years there have been several research programs to guide care providers in workingwith the legal framework for psychiatric care and the care for people with intellectual disability.Mostly, the focus is on creating quality guidelines to reduce restrictive measures. Incollaboration with the Free <strong>University</strong> (medical centre) and the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tilburg, theHogeschool Leiden is currently doing research on restrictive measures in the care for youngpeople with mild intellectual disorders (MID). Young people with MID represent a difficultgroup <strong>of</strong> clients. They have an increased risk for all kinds <strong>of</strong> problems, from psychiatric to severebehavioral problems. This makes aggression and therefore the need for restrictive measures verycommon among these clients. But the variety <strong>of</strong> the problems also indicates multidisciplinarycare, possibly in more than one care sector, which means that care providers are confronted witha wide range <strong>of</strong> laws and regulations. The first part <strong>of</strong> the research project (September 2011 -April 2013) showed that care providers experience difficulties with the legal framework.Therefore, the project set out a number <strong>of</strong> quality guidelines to raise awareness and to helpreduce (the need for) restrictive measures. The presentation will focus on these guidelines.Low IQ and Risk Measurement: The Use <strong>of</strong> Instruments for Risk Taxation in theMentally RetardedRonald Visser, Klinisch Psycholoog, Amsterdam, Netherlands (ronald.visser@sheerenloo.nl)199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!