12.07.2015 Views

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

Seattle University Collaborative Projects - International Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Equity <strong>of</strong> Mental Health Care: Moral Implications and Future DevelopmentsChristina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis, Tilburg <strong>University</strong> (c.m.vdrfeltz@tilburguniversity.edu)In medicine, autonomy <strong>of</strong> the patient, beneficence <strong>of</strong> the physician, non-maleficence <strong>of</strong> thephysician and justice are four leading ethical principles and several Medical Associations as wellas Psychiatric Associations have published Codes <strong>of</strong> Ethics in which the physician-patientrelationship is considered to be at the heart <strong>of</strong> medical and psychiatric practice. In recentdevelopments, the patient’s perspective is taken into account more <strong>of</strong>ten, i.e. in Shared DecisionMaking and patient preference as leading principles in the choice mental health treatment. Theeconomic framework <strong>of</strong> mental health care should follow the principle <strong>of</strong> equity even more in atime <strong>of</strong> economic recession. If ethical decisions are taken that make it impossible to sustainmedical treatment for economic reasons, unethical injustice in the division <strong>of</strong> means wouldresult. Therefore, viability and economic sustainability have ethical implications in and <strong>of</strong>themselves. However, ethical decisions should also be based primarily upon sound moral valuesand their acceptability in a given cultural context. Limitation <strong>of</strong> access to mental health carebased upon economic considerations, as imposed by the government <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands due tothe economic recession, poses specific ethical challenges, as it intrudes upon the patient-doctorrelationship and the equity <strong>of</strong> division <strong>of</strong> means. Moral implications <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong>pharmaceutical companies and governmental policies are described and possible solutions onmicro-, meso- and macrolevels are suggested. For an ethical approach to the economy <strong>of</strong>psychiatry, not only should the principle <strong>of</strong> equity be followed, but allocation <strong>of</strong> money orresources should always lead toward an ethically sound destination.60. EthicsA Framework for Trustworthiness in the Medical Pr<strong>of</strong>essionKatinka Morton, North Western Mental Health Program, Parkville, Australia(Katinka.Morton@mh.org.au)The importance <strong>of</strong> trust for the medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession seems beyond question. There is a growingsociological literature examining the factors which influence levels <strong>of</strong> interpersonal andinstitutional trust in the medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession. Trust without the guarantee <strong>of</strong> trustworthiness isassociated with risk, however. Although there is undoubtedly much trustworthy conduct withinthe medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession, there has been little attempt to define what trustworthiness is in thiscontext. Philosophy's interest in trust and trustworthiness has been relatively recent, but there arenow a spectrum <strong>of</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> trust and trustworthiness. In this presentation I examine theavailable considerations <strong>of</strong> trust and trustworthiness. I argue that it is only one form <strong>of</strong>trustworthiness that is appropriately considered for the doctor patient relationship. I define thesestandards in the doctor patient relationship, and present a Framework <strong>of</strong> Trustworthiness for the149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!