13.07.2015 Views

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

Bruno Latour, Aramis, or the Love of Technology, PDF - Dss-edit.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"But everybody else says just <strong>the</strong> opposite: 'The thing was doomedbecause it wasn't simplified enough, it wasn't fleshed out enough, itwasn't changed enough, <strong>the</strong>re was no local f<strong>or</strong>ce driving it.""That's it: we're getting hot, we're closing in on <strong>the</strong> maj<strong>or</strong>argument about what is negotiable in a project and what isn't. Onegroup says that <strong>the</strong> initial idea had to be abandoned right away becauseit wasn't feasible, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r guy claims that giving up <strong>the</strong> initialidea is what did <strong>the</strong> project in.""Guess what I just found in <strong>the</strong> Larousse Encyclopedia! An articleon <strong>Aramis</strong>! A long paragraph-listen to how it ends: 'Adoption qf <strong>the</strong>system was considered on <strong>the</strong> basis if studies undertaken by several French cities,Paris in particular. '""Well, well! If your name appears in <strong>the</strong> l.arousse Encyclopedia, youexist a little bit after all."[INTERVIEW EXCERPTS]M Etienne, head <strong>of</strong> Matra.·"Some good engineers convinced us-and <strong>the</strong>y were right-that you hadto proceed in stages, starting with subsystems."Michel Frybourg, head <strong>of</strong> INRETS at <strong>the</strong> time, had convinced everybody,myself included. It was a reaction against <strong>the</strong> Bertin style <strong>of</strong> invention: Bertininvented a whole system around a single <strong>com</strong>ponent, <strong>the</strong> linear mot<strong>or</strong>, and itwas a dud."So we said, 'Okay, let's do it in stages.' We knew, f<strong>or</strong> example, that atOrly we didn't have <strong>the</strong> right mot<strong>or</strong>; that's when <strong>the</strong> ideo <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variable-reluctancemot<strong>or</strong> came up, with <strong>the</strong> jamet bro<strong>the</strong>rs."We did <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> Phase 1 on <strong>the</strong> mot<strong>or</strong>. We said to ourselves, 'We'renot going to try to implement <strong>the</strong> system until we have <strong>the</strong> <strong>com</strong>ponents and <strong>the</strong>subsystems.' Everybody was encouraging us to w<strong>or</strong>k in terms <strong>of</strong> subsystems.They were telling us, 'We won't <strong>com</strong>e on board if you move too fast ' Everybodyagreed, and it wasn't stupid; I was as convinced os anyone, and I stillam."Maybe we manufacturers are in m<strong>or</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a hurry than everyone else. Butwe were moving slowly. Everybody was encouraging us to proceed slowly.'Watch out! Watch out!'"SHILLY-SHALLYINGN THE SEVENTIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!